Valuing Ecosystem Services 2014
DOI: 10.4337/9781781955161.00022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conserving forest wildlife and other ecosystem services: opportunity costs and the valuation of alternative logging regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two options just mentioned are graphically illustrated in Figure 3. Tisdell, 2012). Under Option 1, significant orangutan habitat area A is protected from logging whereas the remainder of the total timber concession area, B, will be logged heavily (or at an intensity that is higher than SFM).…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The two options just mentioned are graphically illustrated in Figure 3. Tisdell, 2012). Under Option 1, significant orangutan habitat area A is protected from logging whereas the remainder of the total timber concession area, B, will be logged heavily (or at an intensity that is higher than SFM).…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section is an attempt to answer this question by assuming a scenario involving a typical primary forest or a forest with a relatively good stock of timber in Sabah that is populated by orangutans, and which undergoes one round of logging per sixty years (following Tay et al, 2002). This exploration is enabled by applying Tisdell's (2012) simple model for comparing the opportunity costs of different logging regimes given the constraint of conserving a single wildlife species.…”
Section: Aroundthese or Should The Area Be Mostly Lightly Logged?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation