2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2015.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conserved molecular switch interactions in modeled cardioactive RF-NH2 peptide receptors: Ligand binding and activation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
1
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The breaking of these switches results in movement of the TM helices, which can activate the receptor (Trzaskowski et al, 2012). These switches are the same as those reported for the AKHR of Drosophila melanogaster , Tribolium castaneum, Anopheles gambiae , and Rhodnius prolixus (Rasmussen et al, 2015), suggesting that the activation mechanism of Schgr-AKHR may be the same.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The breaking of these switches results in movement of the TM helices, which can activate the receptor (Trzaskowski et al, 2012). These switches are the same as those reported for the AKHR of Drosophila melanogaster , Tribolium castaneum, Anopheles gambiae , and Rhodnius prolixus (Rasmussen et al, 2015), suggesting that the activation mechanism of Schgr-AKHR may be the same.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The breaking of these switches results in movement of the transmembrane helices, which can activate the receptor (Trzaskowski et al 2012). These switches are the same as those reported for the AKH receptor of Drosphilia melanogaster, Tribolium castaneum, A. gambiae and Rhodnius prolixus (Rasmussen et al 2015), suggesting that the activation mechanism of Schgr-AKHR may be the same. The DRY ionic lock between arginine and tyrosine is postulated to open and close during receptor activation.…”
Section: Analysis Of Molecular Switchessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Among the repertoire of interactions between 26RFa (19–26) and the human QRFP receptor, the strongest intermolecular contact is predicted between the Arg 25 residue of the peptide and the Gln 125 residue located in the TM3 helix of the receptor (Neveu et al, ), which is known to play a key role in the structure and function of class‐A GPCR (Venkatakrishnan et al, ). Similar ligand–receptor binding interactions have been reported between two insect RFamide peptides, sulfakinin and dromyosuppressin, and their respective receptors (Bass et al, ; Rasmussen et al, ).…”
Section: Rfa/qrfp Receptor(s)supporting
confidence: 70%