2017
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2017.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conserved G-matrices of morphological and life-history traits among continental and island blue tit populations

Abstract: The genetic variance-covariance matrix (G-matrix) summarizes the genetic architecture of multiple traits. It has a central role in the understanding of phenotypic divergence and the quantification of the evolutionary potential of populations. Laboratory experiments have shown that G-matrices can vary rapidly under divergent selective pressures. However, due to the demanding nature of G-matrix estimation and comparison in wild populations, the extent of its spatial variability remains largely unknown. In this s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
9
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such spring warming might reinforce the strength of selection acting on laying date by 139% (a multiplication by almost 2.5), meaning that differences in fledging success between blue tits will keep increasing depending on their laying dates. However, these results must be considered with caution because the population should theoretically respond by advancing its breeding timing (a heritable trait in this population, h² = 0.11 Delahaie et al, 2017). Moreover, mean laying date is expected to advance only if the causal factor (the caterpillar peak) modulating selection pressure remains associated with spring warming (Charmantier & Gienapp, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Such spring warming might reinforce the strength of selection acting on laying date by 139% (a multiplication by almost 2.5), meaning that differences in fledging success between blue tits will keep increasing depending on their laying dates. However, these results must be considered with caution because the population should theoretically respond by advancing its breeding timing (a heritable trait in this population, h² = 0.11 Delahaie et al, 2017). Moreover, mean laying date is expected to advance only if the causal factor (the caterpillar peak) modulating selection pressure remains associated with spring warming (Charmantier & Gienapp, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The strong divergence in genetic variances of the G ‐matrix structures (but with no divergence in genetic correlations) between regions is consistent with many other studies that have compared the G ‐matrix among populations within a species (e.g. Brodie, ; Podolsky et al ., ; Ashman, ; Cano et al ., ; Arnold et al ., ; Teplitsky et al ., ; Delahaie et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The complexities of all these forces interacting have meant that theoretical predictions for how G will change over time have been intractable and the dynamics of G must be studied empirically (Turelli 1988;Revell 2007). There have been several empirical and simulation studies on the stability of G, but results are equivocal, and the difficulty in rigorously estimating one G matrix, let alone multiple G matrices, has meant that we do not yet have a clear picture of how G varies in space and time (Arnold et al 2008;Aguirre et al 2014;Delahaie et al 2017). The advent of statistical methods that allow for rigorous comparison of multiple G matrices-while accounting for uncertainty in each--has increased the impetus and utility of more empirical research on G matrix variability (Delahaie et al 2017).…”
Section: Divergences Between G Matrices and Their Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%