“…While the mat samples harboured a similar cohort of phyla, they were very heterogeneous at the lowest taxonomic level with only 4 ASVs shared among the five lake communities (Figure 3; Table S3) and were distinctly clustered according to their location (PERMANOVA; p = .0001, F = 2.0738) and/or conductivity (PERMANOVA; p = .0002, F = 2.2922) on PCoA ordination (Figure 4). These observations are largely in agreement with previous studies of microbialite‐forming mats from hypersaline Shark Bay, Western Australia (Ruvindy et al, 2016), thrombolites from hypersaline Lake Clifton, Western Australia (Warden et al, 2016), thrombolites (Mobberley et al, 2013), stromatolites from Little Darby Island, The Bahamas (Casaburi et al, 2016), microbialites and non‐ lithifying mats from freshwater habitats along the Trans‐Mexican volcanic belt (Iniesto et al, 2021) and stromatolites from the peritidal eastern coast of South Africa (exposed to both fresh and marine water) (Waterworth et al, 2021). Interestingly, sediment samples were also clustered with mat samples according to lake/conductivity.…”