2008
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1093123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservative versus Primary Surgical Treatment of Acoustic Neuromas: A Comparison of Rates of Facial Nerve and Hearing Preservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such screening options included hearing tests, which were reported to be equivocal between lesions that grew and those that did not. 9,17,31 Interestingly, in line with the findings of Nikolopoulos et al, 22 Martin and colleagues 16 also suggested that cystic tumors should be followed more closely, as they represented a disproportionate percentage of the tumors that grew, especially in cases in which a solid tumor converted into a cystic one.…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Such screening options included hearing tests, which were reported to be equivocal between lesions that grew and those that did not. 9,17,31 Interestingly, in line with the findings of Nikolopoulos et al, 22 Martin and colleagues 16 also suggested that cystic tumors should be followed more closely, as they represented a disproportionate percentage of the tumors that grew, especially in cases in which a solid tumor converted into a cystic one.…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…15 Further, Martin and colleagues' 'intention to treat' analysis showed that conservative management of vestibular schwannomas with an intracranial size of up to 20 mm was safe and yielded significantly better preservation of facial nerve function and hearing, compared with surgical management. 16 Intracanalicular tumours do not exhibit significant growth, compared with tumours with extension into the cerebellopontine angle. 17 We found a significantly higher probability of growth in vestibular schwannomas with an intracranial size of more than 15 mm, in both the sporadic and NF2 groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the Queen Elizabeth Hospital (QEH) in Birmingham, UK, 90% of diagnosed small‐to‐medium‐sized vestibular schwannomas are initially managed conservatively; in other jurisdictions (in particular the United States of America), the practice is less widespread, with only 25% of tumours treated in this manner . Employing an intention‐to‐treat analysis, conservative management has been demonstrated to offer a safe management option for tumours <2 cm in diameter with lower rates of morbidity (facial nerve injury, hearing loss) than when surgery is offered as a primary treatment option . In this article, we develop an economic decision‐analytic model to determine whether initial conservative management of tumours of this size also represents the most cost‐effective strategy when compared to primary surgery or radiosurgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Employing an intention-to-treat analysis, conservative management has been demonstrated to offer a safe management option for tumours <2 cm in diameter with lower rates of morbidity (facial nerve injury, hearing loss) than when surgery is offered as a primary treatment option. 7 In this article, we develop an economic decision-analytic model to determine whether initial conservative management of tumours of this size also represents the most cost-effective strategy when compared to primary surgery or radiosurgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%