2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-02033-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservative treatment versus elective repair of umbilical hernia in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites: results of a randomized controlled trial (CRUCIAL trial)

Abstract: Purpose To establish optimal management of patients with an umbilical hernia complicated by liver cirrhosis and ascites. Methods Patients with an umbilical hernia and liver cirrhosis and ascites were randomly assigned to receive either elective repair or conservative treatment. The primary endpoint was overall morbidity related to the umbilical hernia or its treatment after 24 months of follow-up. Secondary endpoints included the severity of these hernia-related complications, quality of life, and cumulative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the evidence was graded as 'very low' [6]. Studies investigating elective umbilical hernia repair in patients with decompensated cirrhosis did report any mortality related to elective hernia repair after a follow-up of at least 6 months [14,[21][22][23]. Pre-and postoperative control of ascites is associated with reduced risk of reoperation and hernia recurrence [10,[24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the evidence was graded as 'very low' [6]. Studies investigating elective umbilical hernia repair in patients with decompensated cirrhosis did report any mortality related to elective hernia repair after a follow-up of at least 6 months [14,[21][22][23]. Pre-and postoperative control of ascites is associated with reduced risk of reoperation and hernia recurrence [10,[24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there were no significant differences in patient morbidity, likely related to small sample size, patients with conservative management had higher numerical rates of complications (77.8%) as compared with those who underwent elective repair (50.0%). 63 Several risk factors for adverse outcomes after hernia repair have been identified in retrospective studies such as a MELD >15, hypoalbuminemia, anemia, and preoperative small bowel obstruction. 28 , 64 These studies suggest that elective hernia repair is safe in selected patients with cirrhosis, although ongoing studies are needed to identify patients most likely to benefit from a surgical approach.…”
Section: Preoperative Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this series of 108 patients is one of the largest reported for patients with ESLD undergoing umbilical hernia repair, we were unable to report outcomes for patients with ESLD who had an umbilical hernia managed without surgery. Previous studies have compared outcomes of elective surgery versus conservative management [7], but limited data exist on outcomes without surgery in the emergency setting. Further prospective studies are warranted to inform practice and decision-making in patients presenting with ESLD and an umbilical hernia, as well as further delineate the natural history of this condition.…”
Section: Differences Pre-and Post-2014mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These risks are further increased when surgery is undertaken as an emergency [6]. Currently, some centres advocate elective repair to avoid the added risk of emergency surgery [3,7]. Alternatively, a proportion of patients may be eligible for liver transplantation [8,9], and deferring repair to the time of transplantation may be preferred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%