1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00483-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservative surgical therapy for penile and urethral carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4,14,15 The occasional involvement of the urethra by precancerous lesions should be taken into consideration when planning conservative, glans-sparing surgical procedures for limited primary squamous cell penile cancer. 16 Often, in partial penectomies the surgeon leaves a long urethra to preserve urinary function increasing the risk of a positive margin of resection. Carcinoma in situ of urethral epithelium may be the only positive surgical margin of resection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,14,15 The occasional involvement of the urethra by precancerous lesions should be taken into consideration when planning conservative, glans-sparing surgical procedures for limited primary squamous cell penile cancer. 16 Often, in partial penectomies the surgeon leaves a long urethra to preserve urinary function increasing the risk of a positive margin of resection. Carcinoma in situ of urethral epithelium may be the only positive surgical margin of resection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,9,10-12 Indeed, many reports have shown similar 5-year disease-specific survival rates, reducing the width of the resection margins to 10 and 15 mm for grade 1-2 and 3 lesions, respectively. 9,11,13,14 If tumor recurrence occurs, it is usually systemic at the inguinal lymph nodes. In our series of patients treated with total glansectomy, only one patient had inguinal lymph node metastases 18 months after surgery, whereas none had local relapse, and our crude disease-specific survival rate of 93.3% after a mean follow-up of 36 months is similar to that reported by others using conventional surgical treatment.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that local disease recurrence rates were lower with the latter treatment (5.3 vs. 27.7%) but there was no significant difference in overall disease survival [43]. Also, patients undergoing penile-preserving therapy (pN+), and those undergoing a wait-and-see policy for the nodal status are at high risk of developing a recurrence [44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Partial Penectomymentioning
confidence: 99%