2013
DOI: 10.1080/03057925.2012.746897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservative force or contradictory resource? Education and affirmative action in Jharkhand, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mehta and Hasan (2006) find that lower completion rates at secondary level of education and economic status are more important factors that need to be addressed in this context than providing reservations based on social identity. Some (for example, Higham and Shah, 2013) have argued that affirmative action policies in India have been conceived as a ‘contradictory resource’ — while on one hand, weaker sections benefit from these policies in securing admission in schools, they nevertheless do not address the deep-seated and historical inequalities; after all the weaker sections, even through these policies, do not necessarily get admission in high quality institutions; besides they result in a division amongst the weaker sections between those who benefit from these policies and those who do not, and remain locked in the vicious circle of exclusion. On the whole, it is widely felt that given the structural nature of caste, religion, ethnicity and class inequalities in contemporary India, the extent to which affirmative action policies can fundamentally redress highly structured patterns of inequality remains doubtful (Syed et al, 2013, p. 715).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mehta and Hasan (2006) find that lower completion rates at secondary level of education and economic status are more important factors that need to be addressed in this context than providing reservations based on social identity. Some (for example, Higham and Shah, 2013) have argued that affirmative action policies in India have been conceived as a ‘contradictory resource’ — while on one hand, weaker sections benefit from these policies in securing admission in schools, they nevertheless do not address the deep-seated and historical inequalities; after all the weaker sections, even through these policies, do not necessarily get admission in high quality institutions; besides they result in a division amongst the weaker sections between those who benefit from these policies and those who do not, and remain locked in the vicious circle of exclusion. On the whole, it is widely felt that given the structural nature of caste, religion, ethnicity and class inequalities in contemporary India, the extent to which affirmative action policies can fundamentally redress highly structured patterns of inequality remains doubtful (Syed et al, 2013, p. 715).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both consumption and investment in education, as expressions of middle-class aspirations, are also part of what Higham & Shah (2013) have called a 'culture of emulation'. 12 Higham & Shah describe how young adivasis with public sector jobs in the education sector have begun to emulate the values, norms, and ways of life of higher-caste and -class groups.…”
Section: Consumption and Lifestylesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rajkumar, too, would rather his wife did not go out to work "in the sun and dust", but stayed at home. Indeed, in CCL-employed households women's participation in manual labour is generally viewed more dimly, which reflects an adoption of new -and more caste-like -notions of gender (see also Higham & Shah 2013). The withdrawal of women like Sikanti from paid work can, of course, have both practical and personal reasons -higher household income through CCL salaries, for example, and personal work/leisure preferences.…”
Section: Gender Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These jobs, trades, and, increasingly, government development and procurement contracts are no longer simply the preserve of the outsiders who for decades maintained control over the state. Whereas once their ancestors sought to keep the state away (Shah 2010 a ), some of the new generations of Adivasis and other lower castes are slowly seeking a share of the pie and diversifying their means of reproduction beyond subsistence farming and wage labour (Higham & Shah ).…”
Section: The Muck Of the Past: Ideology At The Cost Of Political Economymentioning
confidence: 99%