Conservative and Aesthetic Emergency Management in Adolescent with Complex Crown-Root Fracture and Simultaneous Oblique Root Fracture in Upper Maxillary Central Incisor: Clinical Outcome after 18 Months Follow-up Period
Abstract:DÍAZ, J.A.; HOPE, B. & JANS, A.Conservative and aesthetic emergency management in adolescent with complex crownroot fracture and simultaneous oblique root fracture in upper maxillary central incisor: clinical outcome after 18 months follow-up period. Int. J. Odontostomat., 6(1):27-37, 2012.
SUMMARY:Emergency treatment of 11-years-old female patient, presenting a complicated crown root fracture, which simultaneously presented oblique root fracture in the maxillary right central incisor. In order to expose the s… Show more
“…However, the information of long‐term survival is rare and, mostly, includes the case‐reports, among which there are three works with a long observation period; and one stand‐alone multicenter clinical study of Andreasen et al (1995) . The latter study confirmed that the fragment reattachment was a realistic alternative to resin composite buildup for restoring esthetics and function to the traumatized dentition, and revealed the clinical factors that might predict fragment retention or loss and the frequency of pulpal complications .…”
Objective
Among the techniques used by pediatric dentists for the crown fracture is the fragment reattachment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long‐term survival of the tooth reattachment in comparison to the composite restoration technique.
Methods
The study included 67 patients aged 7‐9 years (males 38/56.7%; females 29/43.3%), with noncomplicated fractures of permanent teeth. The patients were divided into two groups; group A included 32 patients (males 18/56.2%; females 14/43.8%; total number of affected tooth 36), and group B comprised 35 patients (males 20/57.1%; females 15/42.9%; 36 affected tooth). In group A patients the reattachment was conducted after the trauma, and the direct composite restoration technique was used for patients in group B. All patients were evaluated for complications and pulp status for 5 years.
Results
There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in terms of the occurrence of complications observed between groups throughout the 5‐year observation period.
Conclusion
Both methods provide similar results over the 60 months of observation.
Clinical Significance
Reattachment technique has shown to be a reliable treatment option that might be considered as a primary technique when the fragment is saved after the trauma.
“…However, the information of long‐term survival is rare and, mostly, includes the case‐reports, among which there are three works with a long observation period; and one stand‐alone multicenter clinical study of Andreasen et al (1995) . The latter study confirmed that the fragment reattachment was a realistic alternative to resin composite buildup for restoring esthetics and function to the traumatized dentition, and revealed the clinical factors that might predict fragment retention or loss and the frequency of pulpal complications .…”
Objective
Among the techniques used by pediatric dentists for the crown fracture is the fragment reattachment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long‐term survival of the tooth reattachment in comparison to the composite restoration technique.
Methods
The study included 67 patients aged 7‐9 years (males 38/56.7%; females 29/43.3%), with noncomplicated fractures of permanent teeth. The patients were divided into two groups; group A included 32 patients (males 18/56.2%; females 14/43.8%; total number of affected tooth 36), and group B comprised 35 patients (males 20/57.1%; females 15/42.9%; 36 affected tooth). In group A patients the reattachment was conducted after the trauma, and the direct composite restoration technique was used for patients in group B. All patients were evaluated for complications and pulp status for 5 years.
Results
There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in terms of the occurrence of complications observed between groups throughout the 5‐year observation period.
Conclusion
Both methods provide similar results over the 60 months of observation.
Clinical Significance
Reattachment technique has shown to be a reliable treatment option that might be considered as a primary technique when the fragment is saved after the trauma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.