Conservation's Friends in High Places: Neoliberalism, Networks, and the Transnational Conservation Elite

Abstract

Global conservation has changed over the last two decades. As conservation NGOs have grown in size and stature, they have increasingly turned to businesses and market mechanisms and they are increasingly replacing the state in delivering conservation programs. This article argues that at the heart of global conservation lies a small, well-connected elite, made up of directors and senior staff of key conservation NGOs, state politicians and bureaucrats, corporate directors, scientists, celebrities, and media actors. This elite network works as influence, ideas, and money are spread in formal spaces, such as conferences and meeting rooms, and in informal occasions such as social events. Drawing on emerging studies of conservation bureaucracies and NGOs, this article outlines the workings and structure of this elite, illustrated through four detailed vignettes. It situates the elite in the emerging literature on neoliberalism, arguing that this elite is at the forefront of driving the neoliberalization of conservation. © 2011 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Abandoning or Reimagining a Cultural Heartland? Understanding and Responding to Rewilding Conflicts in Wales – the Case of the Cambrian Wildwood

“…Equally, as Arts et al (2016) outline, conflict is often driven more by issues of power differentials than actual differences in stakeholders' agendas (see also Young et al 2016). Where rewilding is driven by wealthy philanthropists there are questions over whether it is a plutocratic imposition, amounting to an undemocratic land-grab (Holmes 2011;.…”

Global, National, or Market? Emerging REDD+ Governance Practices in Mozambique and Tanzania

“…Such rule is assumed to function properly only when property rights are clearly defined under private ownership and the state's role is limited through deregulation (Peck and Tickell 2002). In this system, the state's role is to maintain essential judicial institutions to guarantee the market function, while inevitable minimal regulation is provided voluntarily by the private sector (Holmes 2011;Humphreys 2009, 320). Voluntary participation that replaces control by public authorities is therefore seen to be an organic part of the neoliberal approach (Humphreys 2003).…”

Political ecology and conservation policies: some theoretical genealogies

“…Or should access be limited, for reasons of environmental integrity, to a few privileged visitors? On one side we encounter elitist visions of conservation, associated with exclusion and privilege where local access to resources and visitors' flows of people are limited (Holmes 2011(Holmes , 2012. In these circumstances high-end tourist packages make economic development (the commoditization of nature) and conservation compatible with a low level of impact.…”