2019
DOI: 10.5751/ace-01363-140113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation planning for boreal birds in a changing climate: a framework for action

Abstract: The boreal forests of North America support billions of birds of over 300 species. The region remains mostly intact but is expected to undergo major changes over the next century due to anthropogenic climate change. This warming, and resulting changes in moisture regimes, are altering vegetation and disturbance dynamics, and will likely result in expansion of grasslands and deciduous forests, strongly challenging bird species to keep pace. We present a vulnerability-adaptation framework to guide bird conservat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, our results show there is urgent need to consider future climate threats for boreal bird species; however, threat evaluation while assessing status of species at risk in Canada is based on a 10 years horizon (following IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee (2019) guidelines), which is inappropriate for climate change impacts as impacts will be occurring on a longer horizon. Hence, we recommend the use of a vulnerability‐adaptation framework to guide bird conservation based on species' individual sensitivity and exposure to climate change (Stralberg et al, 2019). This adaptation framework would assess different species' vulnerabilities and provide a suite of strategies to pursue, varying from classical conservation (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In any case, our results show there is urgent need to consider future climate threats for boreal bird species; however, threat evaluation while assessing status of species at risk in Canada is based on a 10 years horizon (following IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee (2019) guidelines), which is inappropriate for climate change impacts as impacts will be occurring on a longer horizon. Hence, we recommend the use of a vulnerability‐adaptation framework to guide bird conservation based on species' individual sensitivity and exposure to climate change (Stralberg et al, 2019). This adaptation framework would assess different species' vulnerabilities and provide a suite of strategies to pursue, varying from classical conservation (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…such as habitat manipulation or even species translocation). For species with high exposure to climate change, such as the 18 species we identified as species sensitive to climate change, long‐term investments in protecting refugia and “stepping stones” (sensu Stralberg et al, 2019) will likely be most effective, favouring natural corridors to help bird species connect with the future range of their habitat in a more fragmented landscape (Stralberg et al, 2019). Future work in this regard using our spatially explicit simulation approach may help identify areas where conservation of old forest stands will be most effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, vegetation communities changing as a result of climate change could favor alternative species assemblages of ducks based on their vegetation preferences. For example, more grasslands may develop in the boreal forest as bogs and peatlands dry out (Stralberg et al ). Additional research is needed to address landscape‐scale influences on nest‐site selection and nest survival to help understand demographic consequences of industrial development on predation and predator communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overwater nesters appeared to be limited by seismic lines and roads in both landscapes as well as by pipelines in unencroached landscapes and well sites in agriculture encroached landscapes. This complexity of varying effect sizes for different guilds between landscapes support the conclusion of Stralberg et al (2019) that conservation objectives need to be carefully articulated before designing conservation actions. Given the overall negative population trends of ground nesters throughout the forested portion of Alberta and a negative relationship with seismic line density, our results suggest limiting seismic line construction in areas where they are currently absent or rare might help conserve habitat for ground nesting species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%