Citizen Science 2018
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation outcomes of citizen science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is proposed that encouraging more diversity of participants in citizen science projects will benefit scientific outcomes by delivering them to a wider population and growing science capital (Edwards et al 2018 ). One evolution that can be observed in this area is that more communities are devising and leading their own citizen science projects (Ballard et al 2018 ; Mahr et al 2018 ) providing practitioners the opportunity to support grassroots community involvement throughout the research process. This has brought with it new trends, for example, the organisation of ThinkCamp events to harness the potential of creative collaboration and support inclusive, co-creation approaches to citizen science (Gold and Ochu 2018 ).…”
Section: Inclusiveness In Citizen Science: Gaps and Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is proposed that encouraging more diversity of participants in citizen science projects will benefit scientific outcomes by delivering them to a wider population and growing science capital (Edwards et al 2018 ). One evolution that can be observed in this area is that more communities are devising and leading their own citizen science projects (Ballard et al 2018 ; Mahr et al 2018 ) providing practitioners the opportunity to support grassroots community involvement throughout the research process. This has brought with it new trends, for example, the organisation of ThinkCamp events to harness the potential of creative collaboration and support inclusive, co-creation approaches to citizen science (Gold and Ochu 2018 ).…”
Section: Inclusiveness In Citizen Science: Gaps and Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citizen science challenges how science is discovered and used to create new knowledge [63]. There is significant scope for citizen science to contribute to conservation approaches [59], and considerable opportunity for local people to become involved in collecting relevant data and/or conducting investigations for marine conservation [32]. In order for society to fully comprehend science and its role in conservation, people need to engage more fully with science and conservation and experience it in their daily lives [27].…”
Section: (B) Marine Citizen Science For Marine Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While no model or format of citizen science is 'better' than another, they may vary in their capacity to contribute to conservation in different ways [59]. The majority of citizen science projects recorded in the survey were contributory in nature, and this might influence how citizen science can support marine conservation in the Ocean Decade.…”
Section: (B) Marine Citizen Science For Marine Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further difficulty is that evolving social norms and expectations will affect public acceptability and social license for marine conservation (Dare et al 2014). An objective for future citizen science and social license research may be in determining how to ignite and sustain interest in marine science and conservation issues (Ballard et al 2018).…”
Section: Project Logistics: Community Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%