1958
DOI: 10.1037/h0045181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation of teaching time through the use of lecture classes and student assistants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…My observation that team teaching with a student reduces the time I spend teaching is matched by an earlier study (Churchill and John 1958). In that study, the testing of students showed that they learned as much from a faculty-student team as from a class taught only by a faculty member.…”
Section: Bene$ts To Facultymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…My observation that team teaching with a student reduces the time I spend teaching is matched by an earlier study (Churchill and John 1958). In that study, the testing of students showed that they learned as much from a faculty-student team as from a class taught only by a faculty member.…”
Section: Bene$ts To Facultymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Most of the literature on the use of classroom facilitators is descriptive and enthusiastic (Churchill & John, 1958;Devolder, DeGrave & Gijselaers, 1985;Diamond, 1972;Friedman, 1986;Heywood, 1988;Lane & Webb, 1986;Mass & Pressler, 1973). Anecdotal evidence and the rapidly growing body of research on collaborative learning support the use of facilitators in the classroom.…”
Section: What a Facilitator Contributes To Student Learningmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The majority of such studies continued to reveal little difference in achievement that could be attributed to any particular method. The investigations by Churchill and John (1958) and by Marr and others (1960) were examples of such studies. Additional information concerning aspects of teaching effectiveness may be found in the volume edited by Gage (1963).…”
Section: Ratings and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 96%