2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10344-017-1110-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation in the southern edge of Tetrao urogallus distribution: Gene flow despite fragmentation in the stronghold of the Cantabrian capercaillie

Abstract: The Cantabrian capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus cantabricus) is an endangered subspecies of the Western capercaillie, endemic of northern Spain, inhabiting the south-western limit of the species range. Assessing genetic variability and the factors that determine it is crucial in order to develop an effective conservation strategy. In this work, non-invasive samples were collected in some of the best preserved areas inhabited by Cantabrian capercaillie. Nine microsatellite loci and a sexspecific marker were analy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strzała et al (2015) provides the following genetic diversity estimates for the capercaillie population of the Capercaillie Breeding Centre in Wisła Forest District: H e = 0.755, Ho = 0.772, N a = 6.3, as well as similar estimations for the capercaillie population of the Bory Dolnośląskie Forest: H e = 0.675, H o = 0.863, N a = 5.3 [Strzała et al 2015]. In general, the genetic diversity estimates for the studied capercaillie subpopulations in Belarus are similar to or slightly higher than the estimates for the Pol ish populations [Strzała et al 2015;Rutkowski et al 2017b], the boreal forests area [Segelbacher et al 2003b], or Southern Europe (the Balkans) [Klinga et al 2020], and higher than the estimates for the populations of Central (Germany, Austria, Italy, and Slovenia) [Segelbacher & Storch 2002;Segel bacher et al 2008] and Western (Cantabrian, Pyrenees, and Vosges mountains) Europe [Rodríguez Muñoz et al 2007;MoránLuis et al 2014;Fameli et al 2017;Cayuela et al 2021]. The obtained inbreeding coefficient estimates for the Belarusian subpopulations of capercaillie match those of the Polish populations (in both cases, the values are not statistically significant) [Strzała et al 2015;Rut kowski et al 2017b], but this estimate does not show high values across the capercaillie range in general [Segelbacher et al 2003a;RodríguezMuñoz et al 2007], with the exception of several popula tions that experienced known dramatic population declines in the past [Cayuela et al 2021].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Strzała et al (2015) provides the following genetic diversity estimates for the capercaillie population of the Capercaillie Breeding Centre in Wisła Forest District: H e = 0.755, Ho = 0.772, N a = 6.3, as well as similar estimations for the capercaillie population of the Bory Dolnośląskie Forest: H e = 0.675, H o = 0.863, N a = 5.3 [Strzała et al 2015]. In general, the genetic diversity estimates for the studied capercaillie subpopulations in Belarus are similar to or slightly higher than the estimates for the Pol ish populations [Strzała et al 2015;Rutkowski et al 2017b], the boreal forests area [Segelbacher et al 2003b], or Southern Europe (the Balkans) [Klinga et al 2020], and higher than the estimates for the populations of Central (Germany, Austria, Italy, and Slovenia) [Segelbacher & Storch 2002;Segel bacher et al 2008] and Western (Cantabrian, Pyrenees, and Vosges mountains) Europe [Rodríguez Muñoz et al 2007;MoránLuis et al 2014;Fameli et al 2017;Cayuela et al 2021]. The obtained inbreeding coefficient estimates for the Belarusian subpopulations of capercaillie match those of the Polish populations (in both cases, the values are not statistically significant) [Strzała et al 2015;Rut kowski et al 2017b], but this estimate does not show high values across the capercaillie range in general [Segelbacher et al 2003a;RodríguezMuñoz et al 2007], with the exception of several popula tions that experienced known dramatic population declines in the past [Cayuela et al 2021].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…A low level of errors associated with the quality of reading of fragment analysis data as well as with the amplification are noted for the used microsatellite loci [Strzała et al 2015;Rutkowski et al 2017b;Fameli et al 2017]. Microsatellite loci BG10 and BG12 were not used in the current work on the genotyping of capercaillie population due to the linkage with sex chromosomes [Strzała et al 2015].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was also suggested by Corrales and Höglund (2012) for a continuously distributed black grouse population in northern Sweden and for Alpine capercaillie (Segelbacher and Storch 2002). For the Cantabrian capercaillie, Fameli et al (2017) did not find distinct genetic structuring despite of anthropogenic fragmentation of the area as well, suggesting maintenance of connectivity. The spread of genes obviously exceeds the assumed dispersal capabilities of black grouse, spanning from 5 to 29 km for females, which is the farther dispersing sex in black grouse, and reaching up to 8.5 km for males Ellison 2002, Warren andBaines 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…13,19 For example, studies based on NGS of the capercaillie ( Tetrao urogallus ), an Eurasian galliform, have pioneered the use of feces and feathers as sources of genetic material. 17,2024…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%