2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation implications of exporting domestic wood harvest to neighboring countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along with the increasing trade volumes, there is growing international interest in the economic and ecological consequences of the Russian ÁFinnish roundwood trade. For example, it has been argued that the increasing imports from Russia to Europe may have negative impacts on the conservation of biological diversity of boreal forests in Russia, while enabling more ambitious levels of conservation in the importing countries, such as Finland (Mayer et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with the increasing trade volumes, there is growing international interest in the economic and ecological consequences of the Russian ÁFinnish roundwood trade. For example, it has been argued that the increasing imports from Russia to Europe may have negative impacts on the conservation of biological diversity of boreal forests in Russia, while enabling more ambitious levels of conservation in the importing countries, such as Finland (Mayer et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past forest transitions in Europe and New England in the 19th and early 20th centuries were facilitated by imports of timber from other regions (10,11). Importing wood is the economic equivalent of exporting ecological impacts (12,13). The international timber trade thus creates illusory images of conservation by preserving forests in accessible, affluent political jurisdictions while extracting natural resources from remote places with permissive or poorly enforced environmental policies (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Russian forests support large volumes of coarse woody debris (CWD) and, accordingly, a high number of species dependent on CWD (Karjalainen and Kuuluvainen 2002; Krankina et al 2002). Due to the history of intensive forest management in Finland, the diversity dependent on CWD in Finnish forests is considerably lower (Siitonen et al 1995; Mykrä et al 2000; Mayer et al 2005, 2006). This lowered forest age and heterogeneity has decreased available habitat in Finland for species that require large areas of old‐growth forest and has therefore increased the reliance of Finnish forest ecosystems on dispersal from mature and old‐growth forests in Russia (Danilov et al 1996; Kotiranta et al 1998; Lindén et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%