Conservation implications of anthropogenic impacts on visual communication and camouflage

Abstract

Anthropogenic environmental impacts can disrupt the sensory environment of animals and affect important processes from mate choice to predator avoidance. Currently, these effects are best understood for auditory and chemosensory modalities, and recent reviews highlight their importance for conservation. We examined how anthropogenic changes to the visual environment (ambient light, transmission, and backgrounds) affect visual communication and camouflage and considered the implications of these effects for conservation. Human changes to the visual environment can increase predation risk by affecting camouflage effectiveness, lead to maladaptive patterns of mate choice, and disrupt mutualistic interactions between pollinators and plants. Implications for conservation are particularly evident for disrupted camouflage due to its tight links with survival. The conservation importance of impaired visual communication is less documented. The effects of anthropogenic changes on visual communication and camouflage may be severe when they affect critical processes such as pollination or species recognition. However, when impaired mate choice does not lead to hybridization, the conservation consequences are less clear. We suggest that the demographic effects of human impacts on visual communication and camouflage will be particularly strong when human-induced modifications to the visual environment are evolutionarily novel (i.e., very different from natural variation); affected species and populations have low levels of intraspecific (genotypic and phenotypic) variation and behavioral, sensory, or physiological plasticity; and the processes affected are directly related to survival (camouflage), species recognition, or number of offspring produced, rather than offspring quality or attractiveness. Our findings suggest that anthropogenic effects on the visual environment may be of similar importance relative to conservation as anthropogenic effects on other sensory modalities.

The impact of artificial light at night on nocturnal insects: A review and synthesis

“…However, some taxa may gain or lose their ability to discriminate colors, depending on the range of wavelengths emitted (Davies, Bennie, Inger, Ibarra, et al, , but see Johnsen et al, ). As a result, ALAN has the potential to impede visual signaling and/or undermine camouflage (reviewed by Delhey & Peters, ). The body color of dusk‐active beetles is most apparent in a purplish light environment (Endler, ; Théry et al, ) and may become less visible to conspecifics under broad‐spectrum ALAN illumination.…”

Combining functional traits and phylogeny to disentangling Amazonian butterfly assemblages on anthropogenic gradients

“…Bearing this in mind, the predominance of the camouflage strategy especially in those environments under forest succession signals a loss of color-related functions. It has been suggested that butterflies exhibiting conspicuous colors, including aposematic and iridescent contrasts, may be declining in their abundance or even disappearing in sites with recent disturbances (Delhey and Peters 2016). The interactions in which these species are involved may have low functional effectiveness in these environments.…”

Colours and colour vision in reef fishes: Past, present and future research directions

“…While turbidity is detrimental for any species relying on high acuity, such as the piscivorous fishes, it may be beneficial to smaller fishes that are obscured from predators (de Robertis et al ., ; Utne‐Palm, ). For the many species of reef fishes relying on visually based mate choice, increased water attenuation has the potential to radically alter choices (Delhey & Peters, for review; Seehausen et al ., for freshwater examples).…”