2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-012-0443-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation genetics of an endangered orchid in eastern Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to this colonization, the Southern Appalachians provided potential glacial refugia for numerous species that now inhabit the Great Lakes region, although the numbers and locations of refugia, the recolonization routes, and hence the dispersal of genetic diversity into this region, are generally not well known (Austin et al 2002;Waldron 1993;Flannery 2003;Church et al 2003;Hewitt 2004;Loehle 2007). Genetic diversity of peripheral plant populations around the Great Lakes has been assessed in a small number of species, and in some cases was found to be low relative to core populations (Hamilton and Eckert 2007;Row et al 2011;Paul et al 2013), although this is not inevitable (Freeland et al 2010). In addition, the evolutionary novelty of disjunct or peripheral populations around the Great Lakes has been quantified for a few species on the basis of putatively neutral markers, and although some studies have found little evidence of genetic novelty (Hamilton and Eckert 2007;Row et al 2011), at least one study has challenged the assumption that disjunct populations around the Great Lakes are genetically similar to core populations (Ciotir et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to this colonization, the Southern Appalachians provided potential glacial refugia for numerous species that now inhabit the Great Lakes region, although the numbers and locations of refugia, the recolonization routes, and hence the dispersal of genetic diversity into this region, are generally not well known (Austin et al 2002;Waldron 1993;Flannery 2003;Church et al 2003;Hewitt 2004;Loehle 2007). Genetic diversity of peripheral plant populations around the Great Lakes has been assessed in a small number of species, and in some cases was found to be low relative to core populations (Hamilton and Eckert 2007;Row et al 2011;Paul et al 2013), although this is not inevitable (Freeland et al 2010). In addition, the evolutionary novelty of disjunct or peripheral populations around the Great Lakes has been quantified for a few species on the basis of putatively neutral markers, and although some studies have found little evidence of genetic novelty (Hamilton and Eckert 2007;Row et al 2011), at least one study has challenged the assumption that disjunct populations around the Great Lakes are genetically similar to core populations (Ciotir et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population genetic studies of both the western (Ross and Travers 2015; Tennefos unpublished data) and the eastern prairie fringed orchid (Paul, Budd and Freeland 2013) support the conclusion that inbreeding is common in these species. Analyses of population patterns of molecular markers in both species found relatively high degrees of homozygosity regardless of population size (P. Outbreeding depression is a concern in a species with the potential for long distance pollen dispersal by hawkmoths.…”
Section: Pollinator Behavior and Self-pollinationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, once mating occurs and offspring are produced, a relatively large proportion of these are dispersed to ‘Far’ distances off the fragment, leaving behind a small number of surviving individuals. The repetition of this process over time apparently leads to the creation of increasingly smaller and isolated subpopulations, which are more susceptible to increased inbreeding levels [ 70 , 23 ]. The reverse of this gene dispersal condition (‘Near’ offspring and ‘Far’ pollen dispersal) does not, in this study, lead to such an increase in F it values, suggesting the latter conditions are more effective in facilitating gene flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%