2017
DOI: 10.23984/fjhas.66540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation education in zoos: A literature review

Abstract: Zoos nowadays often claim that their main objective is nature conservation and that they strive to educate the visitors on this subject. A considerable amount of research has been undertaken on conservation education in zoos. This overview performs a qualitative meta-analysis of the methodology, concepts and results of research articles on zoo visitors, particularly regarding learning, education and conservation. Our main finding is that most of the research uses quantitative methodologies and the qualitative,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
17
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…While 41% of the pupils showed a positive effect when learning about nature conservation on a guided tour, the effect on an unguided tour was slightly lower, and approximately only one-third showed a positive effect. For a detailed literature review of conservation education in zoos, we recommend Nygren and Ojalammi (2018).…”
Section: Evaluating the Educational Impact In Zoosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While 41% of the pupils showed a positive effect when learning about nature conservation on a guided tour, the effect on an unguided tour was slightly lower, and approximately only one-third showed a positive effect. For a detailed literature review of conservation education in zoos, we recommend Nygren and Ojalammi (2018).…”
Section: Evaluating the Educational Impact In Zoosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to re-make the land was to order and control the 'natural' environment in various ways. Colonial practices included the collection of exotic animals for study and/or for entertainment value (Anderson 1995;Nygren and Ojalammi 2018). As animals were collected, they were displayed in terms of their hierarchy and importance to humans.…”
Section: Zoo-logicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major criticisms of conservation education evaluations that examine changes in knowledge, attitudes, and behavioural intentions warn that: knowledge is a minor factor in predicting whether visitors undertake conservation actions ; changes in intentions do not always translate into actual conservation actions (Ballantyne & Packer, 2005;Smith, Broad, & Weiler, 2008); and that measures of changes in conservation actions are seldom informative about the benefits to wild species or habitats, which are the truer measures of conservation success (Ferraro & Pattanayak, 2006;Hughes, 2013;Smith et al, 2010). While research does repeatedly detect small positive changes in visitor knowledge and attitudes (Khalil & Ardoin, 2011), persistent behaviour changes due to this education, or direct benefits to conservation, are rarely evaluated or confirmed (Nygren & Ojalammi, 2017). For example, recent research has persuasively demonstrated that zoo and aquarium visitors leave with an increased understanding of biodiversity and knowledge of actions to help protect it (Moss, Jensen, & Gusset, 2015), but over a longer time frame it is difficult to attribute persistent changes to the visit (Smith et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%