2000
DOI: 10.1007/bf02759600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation and variation of ribosomal DNA in eukaryotes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By sequencing this rDNA region, the authors demonstrated that the difference in IGS size is due to the different number of subrepeated elements. IGS length may vary in different individuals of the same species, and even within the genome of the same individual (Kupriyanova 2000). In G. lutea, we revealed intergenomic polymorphism of rDNA repeats varied in size.…”
Section: Rflp Analysis Of Interspecific Polymorphism Of Ribosomal Dnamentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…By sequencing this rDNA region, the authors demonstrated that the difference in IGS size is due to the different number of subrepeated elements. IGS length may vary in different individuals of the same species, and even within the genome of the same individual (Kupriyanova 2000). In G. lutea, we revealed intergenomic polymorphism of rDNA repeats varied in size.…”
Section: Rflp Analysis Of Interspecific Polymorphism Of Ribosomal Dnamentioning
confidence: 88%
“…It is believed that this is due to the binding of transcription factors, whose amount is limited, to predominantly longer IGS containing more enhancer subrepeats. The deficit of transcription factors leads to inactivation of the nucleolus of one parent because of chromatin condensation, which in its turn is due to differential methylation of cytosine and acetylation of histones, as was demonstrated for wheat-rye hybrids (Kupriyanova 2000).…”
Section: Rflp Analysis Of Interspecific Polymorphism Of Ribosomal Dnamentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations