2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation and the botanist effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
87
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
87
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A long-term study of similar catchments in Sweden by the same observer found no changes in number of species over a 16-year period (Köchy and Bråkenhielm 2008). Many studies have acknowledged the importance of training of field staff and consistency between them (e.g., Ahrends et al 2011;Milberg et al 2008;Vittoz and Guisan 2007), and this study further emphasizes the need for consistency and calibration. Nilsson and Nilsson (1985) used the term ''pseudoturnover'' to describe false changes in species assemblages as an effect of species being missed during field work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…A long-term study of similar catchments in Sweden by the same observer found no changes in number of species over a 16-year period (Köchy and Bråkenhielm 2008). Many studies have acknowledged the importance of training of field staff and consistency between them (e.g., Ahrends et al 2011;Milberg et al 2008;Vittoz and Guisan 2007), and this study further emphasizes the need for consistency and calibration. Nilsson and Nilsson (1985) used the term ''pseudoturnover'' to describe false changes in species assemblages as an effect of species being missed during field work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“… Collected herbarium specimens themselves are not always correctly identified, and it has been shown that identification accuracy may depend on the availability of facilities (Ahrends et al, 2011). Once again, this is not a problem restricted to herbarium records only, but is a source of error that could originate in any biodiversity collecting activities.…”
Section: Challenges Of Using Herbarium Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even thorough post-processing cannot fully eliminate information inaccuracies such as taxonomic misidentifications or incorrectly recorded sampling locations (Soberón & Peterson 2004), as these usually cannot be detected in DAI. Sampled taxonomic re-assessments of original material (Scott & Hallam 2002;Ahrends et al 2011b) and sampled ground-truthing of occurrences (Miller et al 2007) could provide vital information on typical rates of such errors for different taxa, regions and data sources, which could additionally be accounted for in analyses.…”
Section: Prospects For Using Dai In Global Plant Research Conservatimentioning
confidence: 99%