The Palgrave International Handbook of Animal Abuse Studies 2017
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-43183-7_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation and Invasive Alien Species: Violent Love

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conservationists often embody deep concern, even love, for wildlife and nature. Yet, this can be a "violent love" (Srinivasan & Kasturirangan 2017). Systemic harm of sentient animals in conservation is enabled by 3 ethical orientations: collectivism (or holism)-the belief that species matter more than individuals; instrumentalism-the treatment of an entity as a means to an end; and nativism-the view that populations established by humans are unnatural (Wallach et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conservationists often embody deep concern, even love, for wildlife and nature. Yet, this can be a "violent love" (Srinivasan & Kasturirangan 2017). Systemic harm of sentient animals in conservation is enabled by 3 ethical orientations: collectivism (or holism)-the belief that species matter more than individuals; instrumentalism-the treatment of an entity as a means to an end; and nativism-the view that populations established by humans are unnatural (Wallach et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Justifications for killing in conservation are often organised along spatial lines, namely ‘native’/’alien’ distinctions, reinforcing the spatial nature of animal death. Conservation of certain species is often accompanied by violence towards ‘invasive alien species’ (Srinivasan & Kasturirangan, 2017). This discourse of ‘alien’ species, such as the demonisation of possums in New Zealand as ‘alien invaders’ (Potts, 2009) helps to makes them killable.…”
Section: Spaces Of Animal Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on the individualised injustices of extinction relates to a major ecological justice concern raised by extinction studies scholars. Scientific conservation and extinction discourses' emphasis on collectives (species, populations or statistics) inevitably erases individual-level suffering, violence and meaning (Chrulew, 2011;Parreñas, 2018;Srinivasan and Cochrane, 2020;Srinivasan and Kasturirangan, 2017;van Dooren, 2010van Dooren, , 2014. Observing that scientific conversations often emphasise numbers, statistics, percentages and population-level effects, van Dooren (2010Dooren ( , 2014 urges attention to the individually felt experience of pain within the collective process of extinction that are obscured by these emphases on collectives.…”
Section: Scale and Loss: Individual And Species-level Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%