2010
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2010.127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequent and intensified relapse therapy improved survival in pediatric AML: results of relapse treatment in 379 patients of three consecutive AML-BFM trials

Abstract: Relapse remains the major cause of treatment failure in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We analyzed the clinical characteristics, treatment response to relapse treatment and overall survival (OS) of 379 children with AML relapse treated according to three consecutive frontline protocols of the AML-Berlin/Frankfurt/Muenster study group (AML-BFM-87/-93/-98). Of 313 treated patients with data on remission status, 198 children (63%) achieved a second complete remission (CR2). There were no significant diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
137
4
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
15
137
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This fits to the good results after HSCT in CR1 in infants reported here and further indicates that acute toxicities can be better handled than in the past. 15 One problem in infants is the high rate of patients with CNS involvement, which may be due to the high frequency of monoblastic leukemias, as these cells are able to penetrate directly through the cytoplasm of the endothelial cells into the brain. 24 There is no satisfying treatment option, as cranial irradiation is associated with neurological late effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This fits to the good results after HSCT in CR1 in infants reported here and further indicates that acute toxicities can be better handled than in the past. 15 One problem in infants is the high rate of patients with CNS involvement, which may be due to the high frequency of monoblastic leukemias, as these cells are able to penetrate directly through the cytoplasm of the endothelial cells into the brain. 24 There is no satisfying treatment option, as cranial irradiation is associated with neurological late effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 From October 2001, patients were enrolled in the international protocol relapsed AML-2001/01 with a randomized FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocytecolony-stimulating factor) or FLAG/DNX (plus liposomal daunorubicin) induction. 14,15 There were no major changes in supportive-care strategies between the studies. The protocol guidelines recommend general prophylaxis for pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, and also to consider prophylaxis against viridans group streptococci and antifungal prophylaxis.…”
Section: Treatment Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five-year OS was 32%. 6 HSCT is currently considered to be the most promising therapeutic element in second remission (CR2). Germany has about 82 million inhabitants out of which 100 children are newly diagnosed with AML per year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, since standardization of therapy and testing new regimens on a common backbone was thought to be important to the improvement of disease control, by analogy, standardization of supportive care measures and testing of interventions with a common backbone of sup- portive care strategies may allow us to reduce infectious complications in a more rapid and more efficient manner. 7,8 Secondly, since restrictions may negatively affect the quality of life of children and their families, variability in supportive care measures may ultimately result in dissatisfaction of patients and lower compliance. 10 On the other hand, we may be able to describe comparative effectiveness of such practices if we could identify institutions that are otherwise similar with different practices although such an analysis would be highly susceptible to confounding variables.…”
Section: Number Of Centers Responding (% Of Total Centers)/ Number Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, standardization of supportive care may result in improved outcomes. This has primarily been shown for disease treatment outcomes through standardization of cancer therapy and testing new regimens on a common backbone, 7,8 but has also been demonstrated for supportive measures. 9 Second, variability in management complicates care at an institutional level and may lead to dissatisfaction in patients if therapy changes as they move between different institutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%