2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-6054(00)00065-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conséquences professionnelles des algodystrophies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 In the study by Paraskevas et al, 11 the recovery rate was even 100%. The time to return to work also appeared to be consistent with the results reported by Dauty et al, 12 with an average of 10.5 months. 13 The definition of return to work (under what conditions-permanent or temporary?)…”
Section: Work Prognosis Of Complex Regionalsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…10 In the study by Paraskevas et al, 11 the recovery rate was even 100%. The time to return to work also appeared to be consistent with the results reported by Dauty et al, 12 with an average of 10.5 months. 13 The definition of return to work (under what conditions-permanent or temporary?)…”
Section: Work Prognosis Of Complex Regionalsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…9 In addition, predictors for the return to work in CRPS were often based on cross-sectional or univariate analysis due to small sample sizes. [10][11][12] We expect that a multivariate longitudinal model predicting the work incapacity in patients with CRPS might help to better understand this condition. Among the indices for work incapacity, the time to fitness for work (TFW) is a valid measure and independent to the economic context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is true, considering CRPS1 for instance, that very few studies report its socioeconomic impact [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] , and there appears to be wide variability in the rate of return to work, from as little as 30% 2 to as much as 75% 6,7 or more 8 , with most being based on a small number of patients (20 patients, or fewer for 5 studies). A proportion of return to work of over 50% in 12 to 18 th months seemed common, depending on the localisation (upper limb), the cause of CRPS1 (work accident, severe trauma for instance 6 ), and in case of comorbidity (alcoholism, medicinal products).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A proportion of return to work of over 50% in 12 to 18 th months seemed common, depending on the localisation (upper limb), the cause of CRPS1 (work accident, severe trauma for instance 6 ), and in case of comorbidity (alcoholism, medicinal products).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%