2004
DOI: 10.1139/x03-143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of various landscape-scale ecosystem management strategies and fire cycles on age-class structure and harvest in boreal forests

Abstract: At the landscape scale, one of the key indicators of sustainable forest management is the age-class distribution of stands, since it provides a coarse synopsis of habitat potential, structural complexity, and stand volume, and it is directly modified by timber extraction and wildfire. To explore the consequences of several landscape-scale boreal forest management strategies on age-class structure in the Mauricie region of Quebec, we used spatially explicit simulation modelling. Our study investigated three dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For areas characterized by mean fire sizes or fire cycles not represented, the nearest values could be used or interpolated from other regimes in the tables. Furthermore, to take into account catastrophic events and possible interactions between cutting activities and uncontrolled fire events , Fall et al 2004, we have truncated the harvest agglomeration size distribution to 100 000 ha for the fire regime controlled by 60 000-ha mean fire size and to about the 90 th percentile of the fire size distribution for regimes with 3000-ha and 15 000-ha mean fire sizes. Resulting maximum class sizes are 5000-10 000 ha and 20 000-50 000 ha for the 3000-ha and 15 000-ha mean fire size regimes, respectively (Table 3).…”
Section: Forest Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For areas characterized by mean fire sizes or fire cycles not represented, the nearest values could be used or interpolated from other regimes in the tables. Furthermore, to take into account catastrophic events and possible interactions between cutting activities and uncontrolled fire events , Fall et al 2004, we have truncated the harvest agglomeration size distribution to 100 000 ha for the fire regime controlled by 60 000-ha mean fire size and to about the 90 th percentile of the fire size distribution for regimes with 3000-ha and 15 000-ha mean fire sizes. Resulting maximum class sizes are 5000-10 000 ha and 20 000-50 000 ha for the 3000-ha and 15 000-ha mean fire size regimes, respectively (Table 3).…”
Section: Forest Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not include fire occurrence in the model, so if our assumption of effective fire suppression is wrong additional stand-replacing disturbances other than clearcutting can be expected (Fall et al 2004). However, in Ontario if large fires that have an impact wood supply occur, the wood supply modelling is redone.…”
Section: Scenario Design and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annual harvest rate inevitably declines when a traditional even-aged silviculture with a targeted regulated forest on short (i.e., <100 year) rotations shifts to incorporate the maintenance of older age classes, including mid-and lateseral forests. For example, Fall et al (2004) reported that a harvest rate of 65% of maximum harvest (regulated forest on a rotation age of 100 years) maintains harvest levels and older stand age classes compared to extended rotations without fire reductions. However, an analysis has yet to be done using an operational forest management plan that even currently includes some regulated constraints on the maintenance of old-growth targets and protected forested areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a landscape-level disturbance simulation model (Fall et al 2004) to estimate the expected amount and variability of habitat. In overview, the simulation model captures both landscape disturbance and forest management and generates indicators of forest structure through time.…”
Section: Habitat Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To parameterize the simulation model, estimates of the fire cycle and number of fires per year are needed (Fall et al 2004). The number of fires per year is equal to the forested area divided by mean fire size and fire cycle.…”
Section: Habitat Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%