1998
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<1707:coutsm>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of Using the Splitting Method for Implementing Physical Forcings in a Semi-Implicit Semi-Lagrangian Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Including the source term S in this way ensures that the scheme obtains the exact steady-state solution (18), and thereby satisfies the fourth requirement -maintenance of the steady-state solution -whose importance was demonstrated by Caya et al (1998). Eliminating F * , F * * and F * * * , we obtain:…”
Section: Full Nonlinear Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Including the source term S in this way ensures that the scheme obtains the exact steady-state solution (18), and thereby satisfies the fourth requirement -maintenance of the steady-state solution -whose importance was demonstrated by Caya et al (1998). Eliminating F * , F * * and F * * * , we obtain:…”
Section: Full Nonlinear Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maintenance of steady-state solutions. Some existing schemes do not properly maintain steady-state solutions, but instead wrongly distort them (Caya et al, 1998;Murthy and Nanjundiah, 2000;Dubal et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…introduced in SWC02a as an extension of the work by Caya et al (1998), is interpreted as follows. The first term on the right-hand side of (2) represents a sum of relaxation processes and the second term represents a sum of oscillatory forcings (with R α the forcing amplitude, k the wave number and α the frequency).…”
Section: Methodology and First Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, if the sequential scheme is run without any additional forcings besides S, the step (8) always directly follows step (10), except for the first and the last time step of the integration. However, following Caya et al (1998), the properties of these schemes will be determined with respect to their steady-state solution and, as will be shown below, these will be different for different values of η. Due to the nonlinearity and issues of stability, the updating of the damping is usually performed at least in a partly implicit way.…”
Section: Fractional Time-stepping Schemes For the Nonlinear Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%