2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4488(03)00145-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of underfeeding on digestion and absorption in sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
1
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
39
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results did not indicate the negative relationship between intake and digestibility reported previously (Colucci et al, 1990), presumably because the negative relationship between these variables has been established in experiments conducted at levels of intake above maintenance (Doreau et al, 2003). Conversely, the lack of intake level effects on digestibility was also observed in other studies (Puchala et al, 2005;Tovar-Luna et al, 2011), in goats fed near maintenance.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results did not indicate the negative relationship between intake and digestibility reported previously (Colucci et al, 1990), presumably because the negative relationship between these variables has been established in experiments conducted at levels of intake above maintenance (Doreau et al, 2003). Conversely, the lack of intake level effects on digestibility was also observed in other studies (Puchala et al, 2005;Tovar-Luna et al, 2011), in goats fed near maintenance.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…However, energy loss in methane proportional to OM intake was similar among levels of feed restriction; consequently, dietary metabolizability (q) did not differ among treatments either. A previous study pointed out that, during periods of feed restriction, animals experience metabolic and ruminal environmental changes to offset the low feed allowance (Doreau et al, 2003), which may impact their performance. Nonethless, the high-quality diet offered to animals in this Table 2 -Intake, digestibility, methane emission, and energy balance of goats subjected to feed restriction BW -body weight; OM -organic matter; ME -metabolizable energy; DE -digestible energy; q -metabolizability; L -ratio between ME intake and ME required for maintenance (462 kJ/kg 0.75 BW; NRC, 2007); ME/DE -ratio between ME and digestible energy of diet; SEM -standard error of the mean.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drop in digestion at 0.4 M may relate to lower available energy for microbes (Doreau et al, 2003) and lower water intake.…”
Section: Digestibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O consumo e os coeficientes de digestibilidade aparente dos nutrientes são influenciados por fatores como o teor de nutrientes, pelos efeitos associativos entre os alimentos, pela relação Volumoso:Concentrado e pelo processamento dos alimentos FURUSHO-GARCIA et al, 2003;SILVA et al, 2005;MACEDO JUNIOR et al, 2006;SILVA et al, 2007;ARRUDA et al, 2008;ZANINE & MACEDO JUNIOR, 2006;MACEDO JUNIOR et al, 2009;GOMES et al, 2012). O tempo de ruminação é, consideravelmente, influenciado pelas características físicas da dieta, como tamanho de partícula ), e pelo manejo nutricional adotado, como número de refeições (DOREAU & DOREAU, 2001;DEVRIES et al, 2005;DOREAU, et al, 2003). A determinação da produção de calor (PC) pelo animal em jejum é importante, pois representa a energia gasta com a mantença (RODRIGUEZ et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified