1967
DOI: 10.1086/149266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of the Distribution of Galactic Cosmic-Ray Density in the Solar System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the practical difficulties, caused by time variations of the cosmic ray intensity, instrumental drifts, and meteorological and environmental variations, are great. Consequently, the existence of the required density gradient which should manifest itself as an annual variation in the nucleonic intensity of about 1%, has not been confirmed (Subramanian, 1970).…”
Section: Semidiurnal Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the practical difficulties, caused by time variations of the cosmic ray intensity, instrumental drifts, and meteorological and environmental variations, are great. Consequently, the existence of the required density gradient which should manifest itself as an annual variation in the nucleonic intensity of about 1%, has not been confirmed (Subramanian, 1970).…”
Section: Semidiurnal Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subramanian and Sarabhai (1967), ascribing this gradient to the distribution of Three cases of possible cosmic ray density distributions. Full galactic cosmic ray density is assumed for 0 = 90 ~ (Subramanian and Sarabhai, 1967).…”
Section: Semidiurnal Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The angular diameter θ of the gyro-orbit is related to the rigidity by the expression (Subramanian & Sarabhai 1967) …”
Section: Gradient Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well established that the daily variation observed in local solar time has both diurnal (a pure sine wave with a period of 24 hours) and semidiurnal components. Subramanian and Sarabhai [1967] and Quenby and Lietti [1968] first attributed the semidiurnal component to a second-order anisotropy arising from a bidirectional latitudinal density gradient, in which cosmic ray density increases on both sides of the a higher population of particles exists. Analyzing the diurnal variations observed by neutron monitors and an ionization chamber over a time span exceeding 50 years, Bieber and Chen [1991] confirmed the existence of a bidirectional latitudinal density gradient which reversed with the solar magnetic polarity reversal at approximately every solar sunspot maximum period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%