1985
DOI: 10.1002/anie.198505293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of Strain for the Structure of Aliphatic Molecules

Abstract: The chemist is accustomed to deriving structures and preferred conformations of organic compounds from rigid molecular models and standard values for bond lengths, bond angles, and torsional profiles. In the case of strained compounds, this rigid structural model has to be abandoned and replaced by a flexible one which takes individual conditions of strain into consideration. It is shown, on the basis of new experimental structural data, that the force field method is suitable and highly reliable for the calcu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The capturing of the oct-1-yl radical by the persistent radical TEMPO (36) at 208 is slower by one order than diffusion rate and shows E A ¼ 1.8 AE 0.9 kcal mol À1 [42]. When sterically demanding substituents are introduced in ethane, the central bond is widened and loses energy, as systematic studies by Rüchardt et al revealed [43]. Whether the recombination of the strained radicals has to overcome an activation barrier could not be established with certainty.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The capturing of the oct-1-yl radical by the persistent radical TEMPO (36) at 208 is slower by one order than diffusion rate and shows E A ¼ 1.8 AE 0.9 kcal mol À1 [42]. When sterically demanding substituents are introduced in ethane, the central bond is widened and loses energy, as systematic studies by Rüchardt et al revealed [43]. Whether the recombination of the strained radicals has to overcome an activation barrier could not be established with certainty.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The geminal H-H couplings within the CH, groups, 14-14. 5 Hz, suggest that distortions of H-C-H angles do not accompany those of C-C-C angles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It is also longer than the corresponding bonds in (Io), (Im) and (II) [1.789 (2), 1.785 (2) and 1.773 (4) A Ê , respectively]. Furthermore, comparison of the non-bonding distances clearly shows that steric repulsions like those described by Ru à chardt & Beckhaus (1985) cannot be a major reason for the SÐC1 bond elongation in (III). The SÐ C1 and C1ÐC2 bond orders in (II) (1.16 and 1.06, respectively) and (III) (1.12 and 1.02, respectively) are smaller than their analogues observed in the stable polymorph (Im) (1.26 and 1.11, respectively).…”
Section: Molecular Structure Of (Ii) and (Iii)mentioning
confidence: 82%