2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of phonological variation for algorithmic word segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, words often share reduced pronunciations with other words' canonical and reduced forms: for example, the three words heel, he'll , and hill all share commonly attested pronunciations in American English. These three types are not unusual—such variation‐driven entanglement is the predominant case (2/3 of types, 85% of tokens; Beech & Swingley, 2023). Even if children could identify speech sounds in context the same way native‐speaker corpus transcribers do, children would need additional principles to sort out phonology and the lexicon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, words often share reduced pronunciations with other words' canonical and reduced forms: for example, the three words heel, he'll , and hill all share commonly attested pronunciations in American English. These three types are not unusual—such variation‐driven entanglement is the predominant case (2/3 of types, 85% of tokens; Beech & Swingley, 2023). Even if children could identify speech sounds in context the same way native‐speaker corpus transcribers do, children would need additional principles to sort out phonology and the lexicon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%