2000
DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200011000-00021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of Nonpenetrating Projectile Impact on a Protected Head: Study of Rear Effects of Protections

Abstract: This first step toward a better understanding of the rear effect phenomenon in relation to its consequences on brain tissue will lead to the design of more efficient protections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover a linear skull fracture is predicted in the rear effect impact configuration through the destruction of 16 composite shell elements on the skull close to the impact location on the human head of the deformed aluminium plate. These results are more or less consistent (except for the brain pressure) with the ones obtained by (Sarron et al, 2000) who simulated experimentally the rear effect impact configuration, in terms of:…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover a linear skull fracture is predicted in the rear effect impact configuration through the destruction of 16 composite shell elements on the skull close to the impact location on the human head of the deformed aluminium plate. These results are more or less consistent (except for the brain pressure) with the ones obtained by (Sarron et al, 2000) who simulated experimentally the rear effect impact configuration, in terms of:…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Nevertheless efforts have still to be made in the FEM of the skull, and especially in its geometry, in order to simulate the depressive fractures that are usually observed in experimental tests when ballistic projectiles with small dimensions and weight and launched at high velocities impact living tissues. For example, a hole ranging between a thickness of 9 and 13 mm is observed on the skull in the rear effect impact configuration experimental tests of (Sarron et al, 2000). Such depressive fractures are sometimes observed at the contact location of the impacting ballistic projectiles in addition to the linear fractures.…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the space between the armor and the body and reducing the contact between the protrusion of the armor and the body would reduce the energy that is transmitted. 35 Although the spine was protected according to the standards of the US National Institute of Justice III (NIJ III), the impact also caused concussion or contusion of the spinal cord and distant injury of the brain, leading to paralysis and cognitive dysfunction. All of the wounded should be treated as soon as possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FEM have been used for the development of ballistic helmets and to study the rear effect of a gunshot impact on protection helmets [44][45][46]. It appears possible to study the effect of an intermediate target on gunshot injuries, but to date, no study has been made to study the feasibility of this technique.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%