2016
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arw031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of natal philopatry for reproductive success and mate choice in an Alpine rodent

Abstract: Quantifying the interaction between dispersal, kinship, and genetic structure can provide insights into the factors that shape kinstructured mammal societies. Here, we first employ a combination of 8 years of capture-mark-recapture and molecular data to characterize the spatial and genetic relationships among female snow voles (Chionomys nivalis) in a population located in the Swiss Alps. Subsequently, we examine the individual-level consequences of kin structure in terms of fitness and mating patterns. Behavi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We further tested for temporal stability in the genetic structure by comparing genetic diversity and genetic composition of the Jirisan National Park population between 2015 and 2019. We hypothesized that A. agrarius populations show high dispersal ability but female philopatry, as suggested in previous studies (Clutton -Brock and Lukas, 2012;García-Navas et al, 2016;Jo et al, 2017). Therefore, we predicted that there would be elevated levels of population connectivity via high gene flow occurring across the BMR populations and also that maternally inherited mtDNA marker would exhibit more geographic structure than biparental microsatellites, due to female's home-site fidelity with male dispersal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We further tested for temporal stability in the genetic structure by comparing genetic diversity and genetic composition of the Jirisan National Park population between 2015 and 2019. We hypothesized that A. agrarius populations show high dispersal ability but female philopatry, as suggested in previous studies (Clutton -Brock and Lukas, 2012;García-Navas et al, 2016;Jo et al, 2017). Therefore, we predicted that there would be elevated levels of population connectivity via high gene flow occurring across the BMR populations and also that maternally inherited mtDNA marker would exhibit more geographic structure than biparental microsatellites, due to female's home-site fidelity with male dispersal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Some recent studies of mammalian species have suggested that several species may not discriminate against inbreeding and actually seek for inbreeding, particularly when the reproductive cost of inbreeding is low (Szulkin et al, 2009;Rioux-Paquette et al, 2010;Olson et al, 2012). Although the ultimate ecological and evolutionary explanations as to the mechanisms of inbreeding are uncertain, the significant IBD patterns only found in mtDNA would provide genetic evidence supporting the notion that especially female A. agrarius has a higher homing fidelity and therefore more tends to be sedentary (García-Navas et al, 2016;Jang et al, 2021). However, additional analysis using more microsatellite markers would be required to substantiate the findings, as larger number of microsatellite markers (e.g., N > 12) could provide more accurate results, although the number of markers needed may differ among species (Wang et al, 2021).…”
Section: A B Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In wild, it is often necessary to perform parentage analysis on a breeding population to quantify individual reproductive performance. A breeding population can be substantially larger in area size than a population used for demographic studies even for small mammals with limited mobility (e.g., parentage studies: 0.5-23 ha, García-Navas, Bonnet, Waldvogel, Camenisch, & Postma, 2016;Gooderham & Schulte-Hostedde, 2011;Patterson & Schulte-Hostedde, 2011;Shaner, Yu, Ke, & Li, 2017; demographic studies: 0.05-0.5 ha, Forbes et al, 2014;Lo & Shaner, 2015;Pedersen & Greives, 2008;Vandegrift et al, 2008). Furthermore, individual reproductive success mainly reflects relative fitness, which is more meaningful in the context of a breeding population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%