“…These results could potentially be attributed to two mechanisms: a cost of reproduction, in the form of fewer resources remaining for allocation to immune‐mediated parasite resistance (Sheldon & Verhulst, ), or an increase in exposure across the season as hungry females spend more time foraging in nutrient‐rich, but also parasite‐rich tussock vegetation (Hutchings, Milner, Gordon, Kyriazakis, & Jackson, ). While changes in exposure could explain some of the change in FEC across the season, experimental studies in domestic sheep show that variation in exposure has a weaker effect on the PPR compared to variation in nutrition (Kidane, Houdijk, Tolkamp, Athanasiadou, & Kyriazakis, ). Our results add to the evidence from wild populations that females making a large reproductive effort experience a cost in the form of increased parasite burden (Knowles et al, ; Nordling et al, ; Richner et al, ).…”