2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-019-1365-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of habitat fragmentation on genetic diversity and structure of Salix alba L. populations in two major river systems of Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the null alleles generated using SSR markers may also be attributable to the positive value of F IS [44]. The overall F ST value in our study (from 0.0068 to 0.3063) indicated significant differentiation among provenances, which is comparable with data for S. purpurea (from 0.064 to 0.420) [23] and S. arbutifolia (from 0.01 to 0.41) [29], but much higher than that reported for S. viminalis (from 0.040 to 0.119) [21], S. psammophila (from 0.008 to 0.016) [22], S. alba (F ST = 0.07) [25], and several Populus species [44]. As described by Wright [46], F ST > 0.25 represents an enormous genetic differentiation, 0.25 > F ST > 0.15 indicates a comparatively large genetic differentiation, 0.15 > F ST > 0.05 shows a moderate genetic differentiation, and F ST < 0.05 is negligible.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the null alleles generated using SSR markers may also be attributable to the positive value of F IS [44]. The overall F ST value in our study (from 0.0068 to 0.3063) indicated significant differentiation among provenances, which is comparable with data for S. purpurea (from 0.064 to 0.420) [23] and S. arbutifolia (from 0.01 to 0.41) [29], but much higher than that reported for S. viminalis (from 0.040 to 0.119) [21], S. psammophila (from 0.008 to 0.016) [22], S. alba (F ST = 0.07) [25], and several Populus species [44]. As described by Wright [46], F ST > 0.25 represents an enormous genetic differentiation, 0.25 > F ST > 0.15 indicates a comparatively large genetic differentiation, 0.15 > F ST > 0.05 shows a moderate genetic differentiation, and F ST < 0.05 is negligible.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…[19], Populus trichocarpa Torr. & Gray [20], Salix viminalis L. [21], Salix psammophila C. [22], Salix purpurea L. [23,24], and Salix alba L. [25], have been extensively characterized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "epitype" LE 01065618 was collected in Turkey. Salix alba is common in Turkey (Skvortsov & Edmondson, 1982;Degirmenci & al., 2019;Marchenko, 2019), which also supports our above conclusion that the specimen annotated as the "epitype" of S. euxina belongs to S. alba. Belyaeva's (2009) statement about the origin of S. fragilis in Asia Minor is doubtful; we analyzed the cited specimens of the pure S. fragilis from that region (Skvortsov, 1973;Skvortsov & Edmondson, 1982) and reported that the identification of none of them can be confirmed (Table 3) (Marchenko & Kuzovkina, 2020b).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large population was crossed between two S. viminalis × (S. viminalis × S. schwerinii) hybrid by using AFLP and SNPs (Hanley et al, 2006). In Turkey the microsatellite markers (SSR) were used to determine the genetic variation of Salix alba (Değirmenci et al, 2019). Molecular breeding tools are important to provide powerful approaches for gene discovery, however, genetic linkage maps with technology of mapping of QTL have greater impact on bioenergy (Brunner et al, 2007).…”
Section: Genetic Composition Of Willows In Bioenergymentioning
confidence: 99%