2018
DOI: 10.1111/fwb.13112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of dam‐altered thermal regimes for a riverine herbivore's digestive efficiency, growth and vulnerability to predation

Abstract: Rivers around the world are undergoing shifts in thermal regime due to climate change and human appropriation of water resources. The local impacts of thermal regime change are challenging to predict because water temperature can influence aquatic organisms and communities at multiple levels simultaneously. For example, thermal change can influence the phenology of periphyton blooms, primary consumer physiology and behaviour, and interspecific interactions with predators. Using tadpoles of the threatened river… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(136 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although growth may be not directly compromised and individuals may increase their short-term survival probabilities by shifting from the aquatic to the terrestrial phase, they might incur costs in later stages. Also, because the physiology of growth and development strongly varies with temperature (Smith-Gill and Berven 1979;Atkinson, 1994Atkinson, , 1996Álvarez and Nicieza 2002), the potential for amphibian larvae to co-exist with predators depends on both behavioral responses and environmental conditions (Catenazzi and Kupferberg 2018). Nonetheless, the adaptive phenotypic plasticity we observed might increase population resilience of amphibians in montane habitats suffering from fish introductions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Although growth may be not directly compromised and individuals may increase their short-term survival probabilities by shifting from the aquatic to the terrestrial phase, they might incur costs in later stages. Also, because the physiology of growth and development strongly varies with temperature (Smith-Gill and Berven 1979;Atkinson, 1994Atkinson, , 1996Álvarez and Nicieza 2002), the potential for amphibian larvae to co-exist with predators depends on both behavioral responses and environmental conditions (Catenazzi and Kupferberg 2018). Nonetheless, the adaptive phenotypic plasticity we observed might increase population resilience of amphibians in montane habitats suffering from fish introductions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Our analysis of 36 stream reaches with repeated census data for R. boylii revealed how population dynamics were related to stream temperature and streamflow. Colder stream temperatures were associated with lower intrinsic growth rates, which is biologically plausible given the faster growth, development, and lower risk of predation for larval R. boylii in warmer temperatures (Catenazzi & Kupferberg, 2017, 2018). Regulated stream reaches had much lower density of egg masses on average.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Model‐predicted temperatures in the NorWeST dataset do not capture the localized water temperature at breeding and tadpole‐rearing sites within streams (Catenazzi & Kupferberg, 2017) because of the spatial and temporal heterogeneity in water temperature that occurs both longitudinally along a stream segment and laterally across the width of a channel. The optimal temperature for tadpole food assimilation, growth, and survival in R. boylii likely peaks around 18–22°C (Catenazzi & Kupferberg, 2018) and declines at higher temperatures (Catenazzi & Kupferberg, 2013, 2017). Temperatures above the optimal range for tadpole development have several potential negative effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of a reservoir can severely modify the thermal regime of the river downstream, including increasing winter water temperatures (Dickson, Carrivick, & Brown, 2012; Raddum, 1985), reducing summer temperatures (Soja & Wiejaczka, 2014; Vinson, 2001), increasing diel constancy (Casado, Hannah, Peiry, & Campo, 2013; Horne, Rutherford, & Wehrly, 2004), and changing the timing of thermal events (Cowx, Young, & Booth, 1987; Preece & Jones, 2002). Thermal alterations within regulated rivers have been shown to prompt a range of ecological responses, including behavioural changes (Catenazzi & Kupferberg, 2018), demographic shifts (e.g., birth rate, recruitment—Rolls et al, 2013), the composition and diversity of biotic communities (Benítez‐Mora & Camargo, 2014; Lessard & Hayes, 2003), ecosystem functionality (Bruno et al, 2019; White et al, 2017), and food‐web complexity (Cross et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%