2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 1 , 2 ] Leak incidence rates vary significantly, as they depend on multiple factors, including surgeon experience and skills, anatomic location, as well as overall patient condition. [ 3 ] In the case of gastric surgery, anastomotic leak rates can reach up to 20% for esophagectomies [ 2 , 4 , 5 ] and up to 5% for gastrectomies and bariatric surgeries. [ 6 , 7 , 8 ] Although the chance of developing an anastomotic leak after a gastrectomy or a bariatric surgery is relatively low for an individual patient, the rising numbers of gastric cancer and obesity‐affected patients will likely result in a surge of patients suffering from gastric leaks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1 , 2 ] Leak incidence rates vary significantly, as they depend on multiple factors, including surgeon experience and skills, anatomic location, as well as overall patient condition. [ 3 ] In the case of gastric surgery, anastomotic leak rates can reach up to 20% for esophagectomies [ 2 , 4 , 5 ] and up to 5% for gastrectomies and bariatric surgeries. [ 6 , 7 , 8 ] Although the chance of developing an anastomotic leak after a gastrectomy or a bariatric surgery is relatively low for an individual patient, the rising numbers of gastric cancer and obesity‐affected patients will likely result in a surge of patients suffering from gastric leaks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%