2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of a reduction of the upstream power SOL width in ITER

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
108
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
11
108
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter is uncertain because the applicability of the neoclassical transport formula used to evaluate the bootstrap current in this region is questionable. For the typical values of p ped = 3.0-5.3 kPa obtained from SOLPS simulations for these plasmas with k q = 1.2-3.6 mm [5], these MHD pressure gradient limits correspond to k p = 5.5-8.5 mm at W N = 0.995, similar to the values obtained in a previous analysis following a similar approach [6].…”
Section: Analysis Of Pedestal and Sol Plasma Mhd Stability In Iter Q supporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The latter is uncertain because the applicability of the neoclassical transport formula used to evaluate the bootstrap current in this region is questionable. For the typical values of p ped = 3.0-5.3 kPa obtained from SOLPS simulations for these plasmas with k q = 1.2-3.6 mm [5], these MHD pressure gradient limits correspond to k p = 5.5-8.5 mm at W N = 0.995, similar to the values obtained in a previous analysis following a similar approach [6].…”
Section: Analysis Of Pedestal and Sol Plasma Mhd Stability In Iter Q supporting
confidence: 85%
“…The HD model predicts that a key parameter for the determination of k q is the value of the poloidal field at the magnetic separatrix, yielding k q $ 1-2 mm for 15 MA ITER Q DT = 10 plasmas. These values are typically a factor of 3-4 lower than previously assumed in ITER modelling [5] and lead to parallel heat fluxes in the SOL a factor of 3-4 larger than previously considered. While ITER operation is still found to be feasible in this case (through a combination of increased upstream SOL density and the use of extrinsic impurities to radiatively dissipate power in the divertor [5]), these higher heat fluxes pose additional control challenges during transient phases (re-attachment, confinement transients, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of nitrogen is limited indirectly by MHD effects as β N exceeds the value of 3 in connection with N-induced confinement improvement. Higher values of P sep /R and more pronounced detachment are expected to be achieved with higher divertor neutral pressure, as foreseen for ITER from SOLPS modelling [11]. Some operational challenges appeared in AUG so far, which will not apply to larger devices in this extent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The distribution of fluence along the divertor area as measured with probes is plotted in figure 7. The corresponding values of expected fluence in the ITER divertor are provided in [10,11]. Due to the fact that the inner divertor in ASDEX Upgrade is almost always ITR/P5-42 detached yielding to the underestimated fluxes, it was decided to use the data from outer divertors only for this direct comparison.…”
Section: Extrapolation To Iter Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%