2013
DOI: 10.12989/scs.2013.14.4.379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequence-based robustness assessment of a steel truss bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in the case of the undamaged state, the residual strength (pushover) analysis is carried out under horizontal loads having a triangular distribution along the height of the building. This choice is made with two motivations in mind [31]: i) horizontal loads can activate both horizontal and vertical load bearing structural systems of the building and ii) direct reference is made to the unlikely eventuality that a seismic aftershock occurs after an explosion. This event is possible in the case that the explosion occurs after a seismic main shock (e.g.…”
Section: Steel Buildings and Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the case of the undamaged state, the residual strength (pushover) analysis is carried out under horizontal loads having a triangular distribution along the height of the building. This choice is made with two motivations in mind [31]: i) horizontal loads can activate both horizontal and vertical load bearing structural systems of the building and ii) direct reference is made to the unlikely eventuality that a seismic aftershock occurs after an explosion. This event is possible in the case that the explosion occurs after a seismic main shock (e.g.…”
Section: Steel Buildings and Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, two approaches exist to take into account the interaction between the blast load and the structural component: a coupled and an uncoupled approach [17]. Decomposing a system (environment, structure, and actions/loads) is usual in carrying out structural analyses in order to organize the qualitative and quantitative assessment in various sub-problems, see for example the work of Petrini et al [18,19], Sgambi et al [20], Gentili et al [21], and Olmati et al [22].…”
Section: Numerical Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the multiscale modeling method was validated by comparing with the traditional scale modeling method and full-scale modeling method. Olmati et al [16] assessed robustness of the I-35W Minneapolis steel truss bridge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%