2010
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-2150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consent by Proxy for Nonurgent Pediatric Care

Abstract: Minor-aged patients are often brought to the pediatrician for nonurgent acute medical care, physical examinations, or health supervision visits by someone other than their legally authorized representative, which, in most situations, is a parent. These surrogates or proxies can be members of the child's extended family, such as a grandparent, adult sibling, or aunt/uncle; a noncustodial parent or stepparent in cases of divorce and remarriage; an adult who lives in the home but is not biologically or legally re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Legal standards of care for both psychological and medical treatment initiation stipulate that informed consent for services must be obtained from a legal guardian. However, in the medical setting providers may not routinely ask questions regarding legal guardianship for continuation of nonurgent medical services (McAbee & the Committee on Medical Liability & Risk Management, 2010), which is how the PCP in this case illustration likely perceived the warm-handoff IPC consultation. Additionally, the APA guidelines emphasize the consent process begin as soon as possible when initiating treatment, whereas the AMA guidelines state that “physicians treating pediatric patient generally must obtain informed consent from a parent or a legal guardian,” (Opinion 10.016, “Pediatric Decision-Making”; AMA, 2012), and do not contain information about when it is necessary to obtain consent again for a different type of service in the medical setting.…”
Section: The Ipc Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legal standards of care for both psychological and medical treatment initiation stipulate that informed consent for services must be obtained from a legal guardian. However, in the medical setting providers may not routinely ask questions regarding legal guardianship for continuation of nonurgent medical services (McAbee & the Committee on Medical Liability & Risk Management, 2010), which is how the PCP in this case illustration likely perceived the warm-handoff IPC consultation. Additionally, the APA guidelines emphasize the consent process begin as soon as possible when initiating treatment, whereas the AMA guidelines state that “physicians treating pediatric patient generally must obtain informed consent from a parent or a legal guardian,” (Opinion 10.016, “Pediatric Decision-Making”; AMA, 2012), and do not contain information about when it is necessary to obtain consent again for a different type of service in the medical setting.…”
Section: The Ipc Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%