2016
DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1129892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consent behind the counter: aspiring citizens and labour control under precarious (im)migration schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent Canadian study has shown how employers in the service sector in Canada recruit immigrant workers into temporary positions on temporary work visas. Their performance at work then influences whether they will be given an opportunity to apply for permanent Canadian citizenship (Polanco, 2016).…”
Section: The End Of the Ser?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent Canadian study has shown how employers in the service sector in Canada recruit immigrant workers into temporary positions on temporary work visas. Their performance at work then influences whether they will be given an opportunity to apply for permanent Canadian citizenship (Polanco, 2016).…”
Section: The End Of the Ser?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from the likelihood that such aspirations condition workers and employers to an exploitative labour process (Polanco, 2016), several vexing features of Canada's immigration system disrupt the unfolding of plans. Obtaining the appropriate credential and being flexible are but aspects of the protracted temporality that marks the rhythms of daily life for migrants‐in‐waiting (see Barber, 2018).…”
Section: Mobile Workers: Mobile Filipino Labour Navigates Tim Horton mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equally absent from this literature is consideration of effects of the transition or potential transition to permanent residency. While permanent residency status is held out as a solution to the damaging effects of temporary labour programs ( Nakache and Blanchard, 2014 ), with some notable exceptions ( Polanco, 2014 ; Bonifacio, 2015 ; Tungohan et al, 2015; Polanco, 2016 ; Bryan, 2019a ), little has been published on the actual implications of transitioning to permanency for temporary foreign workers and their kin. In addition to redressing this, this paper also illustrates the ways in which the “taken-for-granted” good of permanency can also be harnessed by state and capital to hold migrants in place, and to duplicate hierarchies and structures of accumulation that benefit employers.…”
Section: Migrant Wellbeingmentioning
confidence: 99%