The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1990
DOI: 10.2307/1410158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consent and the Legal Regulation of Policing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(McConville, Sanders and Leng, 1991: 183). See also: Sanders and Young, 2000: 90;Dixon, Coleman and Bottomley, 1990;and Dixon, Bottomley, Coleman, Gill and Wall, 1989. 9 The idea that police are subject to surveillance from their own devices is, of course, nothing new.…”
Section: Policing the Policementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(McConville, Sanders and Leng, 1991: 183). See also: Sanders and Young, 2000: 90;Dixon, Coleman and Bottomley, 1990;and Dixon, Bottomley, Coleman, Gill and Wall, 1989. 9 The idea that police are subject to surveillance from their own devices is, of course, nothing new.…”
Section: Policing the Policementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The legitimacy of policing actions is not solely rooted in reality, rather perceptions and the presence of normative safeguards which foster integrity are important too. Accountability is closely tied to concepts of “policing by consent.” Accountability takes a range of forms; it may be manifest in moral decision-making, embedded in codes of professional conduct and formalized in legal regulation (see Dixon, Coleman, & Bottomley, 1990). Frameworks of police accountability in the United Kingdom are tripartite in nature between the Home Office, Police Crime Commissioners, and Chief Constables.…”
Section: Soldiering By Consentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those who are easier to detect, usually because they have a visible street presence, are the main subjects of police attention. 47 Once a person is processed through the criminal courts, the state is entitled to impose a penalty if guilt is established. Criminal punishments are commonly justified as society's 'retribution' for the harms caused by the offence.…”
Section: The Discourses Of Drug Traffickingmentioning
confidence: 99%