2013 IEEE 32nd International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems 2013
DOI: 10.1109/srds.2013.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consensus with Unknown Participants in Shared Memory

Abstract: International audienceThe shared memory model matches important classes of systems deployed over dynamic networks, as for example, fault-tolerant and high available data centric services. Consensus is a fundamental building block able to realize such reliable distributed systems. Unlike the classical setting where the full set of participants and their identities are known to every process, dynamic networks preclude such global knowledge to be available. In this paper, we investigate and present protocols to s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When this message is delivered by process j, it replies with an ack to i if it has the same knowledge of i (i.e., j belongs to the same component of i). Otherwise, j replies a nack (lines [16][17][18][19][20][21]. It is important to notice that j only replies to i after finishing DISCOVERY.…”
Section: The Sink Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When this message is delivered by process j, it replies with an ack to i if it has the same knowledge of i (i.e., j belongs to the same component of i). Otherwise, j replies a nack (lines [16][17][18][19][20][21]. It is important to notice that j only replies to i after finishing DISCOVERY.…”
Section: The Sink Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the works summarized in Table 1, there are works studying the FT-CUP problem in a shared memory model [17], or other distributed computing problems such as leader election [18], resource allocation [19] and failure detection [20] when participants are unknown. None of these works consider Byzantine failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%