2017
DOI: 10.1177/1932296817706151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consensus Statement on Inpatient Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Abstract: In June 2016, Diabetes Technology Society convened a panel of US experts in inpatient diabetes management to discuss the current and potential role of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in the hospital. This discussion combined with a literature review was a follow-up to a meeting, which took place in May 2015. The panel reviewed evidence on use of CGM in 3 potential inpatient scenarios: (1) the intensive care unit (ICU), (2) non-ICU, and (3) transitioning outpatient CGM use into the hospital setting. Panel m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
108
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
108
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides frequent measurements of interstitial glucose levels, as well as direction and magnitude of glucose trends, which may have an advantage over POC glucose testing in detecting and reducing the incidence of hypoglycemia in the hospital setting (28,29). Several inpatient studies have shown that CGM use did not improve glucose control but detected a greater number of hypoglycemic events than POC testing (30,31).…”
Section: Continuous Glucose Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides frequent measurements of interstitial glucose levels, as well as direction and magnitude of glucose trends, which may have an advantage over POC glucose testing in detecting and reducing the incidence of hypoglycemia in the hospital setting (28,29). Several inpatient studies have shown that CGM use did not improve glucose control but detected a greater number of hypoglycemic events than POC testing (30,31).…”
Section: Continuous Glucose Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technology used to measure interstitial glucose used by the majority of CGMs is affected by substance interference, most notably acetaminophen, but also dopamine, mannitol, heparin, ascorbic, uric and salicylic acid; many of which are commonly used in post-operative cardiac surgical care. [17] Acetaminophen is hydrolyzed and converted into indophenol, which can be followed at 600nm and has been shown to be directly affected proportional to the amount of acetaminophen present. [18] Additional risks specific to intravenous CGMS include concerns of thrombus or biofilm formation, occlusion, and catheter-related infections, rendering them less reasonable options for patients at high risk with other indwelling tubes, catheters and devices.…”
Section: Types Of Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Current Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides frequent measurements of interstitial glucose levels, as well as direction and magnitude of glucose trends, which may have an advantage over POC glucose testing in detecting and reducing the incidence of hypoglycemia (24). Several inpatient studies have shown that CGM use did not improve glucose control but detected a greater number of hypoglycemic events than POC testing (25).…”
Section: Continuous Glucose Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%