2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2013.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consensus stability of a class of second-order multi-agent systems with nonuniform time-delays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, communication delay, which is usually called time delay [20], is another important concern in the consensus of multiagent systems because the local interaction relying on the communication networks will inherently induce time delay due to the limited channel bandwidth or communication congestions [21]. By using the root locus method in frequency domain, the second-order consensus problem of multiagent systems with time delay is investigated in [22].…”
Section: Mathematical Problems In Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, communication delay, which is usually called time delay [20], is another important concern in the consensus of multiagent systems because the local interaction relying on the communication networks will inherently induce time delay due to the limited channel bandwidth or communication congestions [21]. By using the root locus method in frequency domain, the second-order consensus problem of multiagent systems with time delay is investigated in [22].…”
Section: Mathematical Problems In Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consensus algorithms were primarily studied for multi-agent systems with single-integrator dynamics [2], where a general framework of the consensus problem was constructed. Spurred by this pioneering work [2], considerable literatures have grown up to solve the consensus problem in different scenarios, see [4,[12][13][14][15] and references therein. According to the absence or presence of a leader in a network, consensus can be divided into leaderless consensus and leader-following consensus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12][13] While in several real-world scenarios, some agents may collaborate while others compete. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] As far as we know, less attention has been paid to these antagonistic networks in multi-agent systems. Antagonistic interactions are represented as signed graphs, that is, graphs which can assume also as negative weights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%