1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2998(99)80005-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consensus report on quality control of quantitative measurements of renal function obtained from the renogram: International consensus committee from the scientific committee of radionuclides in nephrourology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
127
0
7

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
4
127
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noted in a later consensus report from ISCORN that many of the disagreements about how and where to choose background activity to quantitate individual renal function have been resolved [3]. Unlike the previous report, the group at this time was able to achieve a consensus, but did not endorse one single method as the method of choice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…It is noted in a later consensus report from ISCORN that many of the disagreements about how and where to choose background activity to quantitate individual renal function have been resolved [3]. Unlike the previous report, the group at this time was able to achieve a consensus, but did not endorse one single method as the method of choice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…To help standardize practice and guide interpretation of renal scans, an international group of experts in renal nuclear medicine has recently published consensus reports on (1) angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition (ACEI) renography for renovascular hypertension, 4 (2) diuresis renography, 5 (3) plasma sample clearance measurements, 6 (4) quality control of quantitative measurements obtained from the renogram, 7 (5) technical aspects of renal transplant evaluation, 8 and (6) pediatric renography. 9 The consensus recommendations for acquisition of the renogram data, the recommended quantitative parameters, and basic interpretative criteria are now generally accepted by experts but recent British surveys have shown that only 49% of full time nuclear medicine practitioners in Britain were even aware that a guideline on renal clearances existed.…”
Section: Consensus Reports As Decision Support Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Guidelines and consensus reports have been designed to assist physicians perform and interpret renal studies but for the time constrained physician, they may have made interpretation more complex. To assist in scan interpretation, experts and consensus panels have recommended clearance measurements and the measurement of specific renogram parameters such as time to maximum counts, 20-minute to maximum count ratio, postvoid to maximum count ratio and 20-minute to 2-to 3-minute count ratios for cortical and whole kidney regions of interest (ROIs), [4][5][6][7][8] but for many trainees and practicing physicians, these measurements simply represent a bewildering array of numbers; comfort with the technical requirements of the study and the underlying knowledge of when and how to apply these parameters to assist in scan interpretation may be lacking and, most importantly, physicians may not have time to read and assimilate the relevant papers.…”
Section: Consensus Reports As Decision Support Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There also exists software from commercial actors trying to bridge the gap [4]. Common for these applications is their manual or semi-automatic approach to obtain the parameters [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7,8]. Other approaches to extract the renogram are also introduced in [9,5]. Compartmental modelling has also drawn some attention, in the mid-nineties Fine et al developed a model for parametric deconvolution analysis [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%