2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consensus quality indicators for monitoring multiple sclerosis

Isabel Voigt,
Stefanie Fischer,
Undine Proschmann
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…who compiled 24 quality indicators (QIs) and checklists to document and improve the quality of care for people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). 1 While useful, we miss a critical evaluation of disease monitoring components.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…who compiled 24 quality indicators (QIs) and checklists to document and improve the quality of care for people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). 1 While useful, we miss a critical evaluation of disease monitoring components.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…We appreciate Zettl et al.‘s 1 insightful observations and reflections in their correspondence to our paper “Consensus quality indicators for monitoring multiple sclerosis”. 2 We value any concerns and critical evaluations that enrich the discussion on quality indicators (QIs) for improving care for people with MS (pwMS). With the following response we want to state our position on the individual points of criticism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%