2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.404
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consensus Paper: Probing Homeostatic Plasticity of Human Cortex With Non-invasive Transcranial Brain Stimulation

Abstract: Homeostatic plasticity is thought to stabilize neural activity around a set point within a physiologically reasonable dynamic range. Over the last ten years, a wide range of non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation (NTBS) techniques have been used to probe homeostatic control of cortical plasticity in the intact human brain. Here, we review different NTBS approaches to study homeostatic plasticity on a systems level and relate the findings to both, physiological evidence from in vitro studies and to a theor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
81
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
(161 reference statements)
1
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These changes (i.e. increase or decrease in cortico-spinal excitability) can be induced non-invasively in the human cortico-spinal motor system using continuous or patterned repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols displayed by an increase or decrease in MEP amplitudes [5, 6]. Two patterned rTMS protocols have been established to induce synaptic or cortical plasticity in human primary motor cortex (M1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes (i.e. increase or decrease in cortico-spinal excitability) can be induced non-invasively in the human cortico-spinal motor system using continuous or patterned repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols displayed by an increase or decrease in MEP amplitudes [5, 6]. Two patterned rTMS protocols have been established to induce synaptic or cortical plasticity in human primary motor cortex (M1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the potential of tDCS to modulate brain activity and cognitive function remains a matter of controversy and questionable. It is highly likely that tDCS effects are state-dependent with aa time scale ranging from minutes to hours, and is highly dependent on the immediate history of neural circuits activity (Silvanto et al 2008) and occurrence of synaptic plasticity (Karabanov et al 2015;Ziemann and Siebner 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is commonly described as macrosystem-level changes in neuronal excitability and/or shape and size of cortical maps (representational areas of specific motor functions) (28,29). Microsystem-level cellular changes include formation of new neuronal connections as well as altered synaptic efficacy (21,(30)(31)(32)(33). These effects combined may interfere with the ability of rTMS to evoke the necessary changes in neuronal activity and appropriate remote effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multifaceted cortical neuroplastic changes can be crudely divided into two spatial categories; internal (within-representation) and external (across-representation) (30,34). Their role in symptom formation and recovery are distinct and likely opposite or competitive (34).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%