2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Nonparaneoplastic Autoimmune Retinopathy Using a Modified Delphi Approach

Abstract: Purpose To develop diagnostic criteria for nonparaneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy (AIR) through expert panel consensus and to examine treatment patterns among clinical experts. Design Modified Delphi process. Methods A survey of uveitis specialists in the American Uveitis Society (AUS), a face-to-face meeting (AIR Workshop) held at the National Eye Institute (NEI), and two iterations of expert panel surveys were utilized in a modified Delphi process. The expert panel consisted of 17 experts including uve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
126
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
126
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[4, 9, 14] Our results are in full agreement with this statement. Proof for the definitive diagnosis of (n)pAIR is still missing and even the presence of ARAs is not specific for (n)pAIR, which has been illustrated by the finding of ARAs in control groups and healthy individuals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[4, 9, 14] Our results are in full agreement with this statement. Proof for the definitive diagnosis of (n)pAIR is still missing and even the presence of ARAs is not specific for (n)pAIR, which has been illustrated by the finding of ARAs in control groups and healthy individuals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The presence of ARAs was found in all our patients with presumed (n)pAIR and therefore all fulfilled the criteria for the diagnosis of (n)pAIR. [9]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Delphi methodology is widely used for gathering and processing data from experts to achieve convergence of opinion on a specific real‐world issue, often in the absence of sufficient evidence to provide adequate guidance . The technique has been used to generate simple, robust, expert experience‐based consensus in a variety of disease settings to improve diagnosis . An analysis of the relationship between the characteristics of Delphi surveys and variability in the consensus obtained found there was a little associated variation in consensus indices if the number of questions was in the range 6–40 (the maximum number in our survey was 26 in round 1); similarly, variability was modest if the number of respondents was in the range 6–50 (22 respondents to our survey) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%