Abstract:Multi-disciplinary consensus guidelines for maintenance sedation and analgesia in critically ill children have been successfully produced and are supported by levels of evidence (excluding sedation and analgesia for procedures and excluding neonates). The working group has highlighted the paucity of high-quality evidence in these important clinical areas and this emphasises the need for further randomised clinical trials in this area.
“…Frequency and quality of assessments, pharmacologic therapy, duration of mechanical ventilation, and outcome were compared between baseline (12 months before implementation) and 12 months after implementation. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]; P = .005), and overall staff satisfaction (physicians: 31% vs 89%; P , .001; nurses: 17% vs 55%; P , .001) increased after implementation. Time on mechanical ventilation, length of stay at the ICU, and adverse outcomes were similar before and after implementation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…International guidelines for adults [1][2][3][4] and children 5,6 recommend to titrate analgesics and sedative medication according to defined patientspecific end points. This goal is best accomplished by means of validated pain/agitation and sedation assessment using standardized scales.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We discussed the best possible practice including published evidence 1,5,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and our own clinical experience to develop the Vienna Protocol for Neonatal Pain and Sedation (V-PNPS) (Fig 1). The V-PNPS is a detailed protocol for the management of pain, agitation, and sedation and includes frequency of assessments, drug type, dosage, and a flowchart indicating when to use which drug according to N-PASS values.…”
Section: Development Of the Vienna Protocol For Neonatal Pain And Sedmentioning
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the implementation of a neonatal pain and sedation protocol at 2 ICUs.
METHODS:The intervention started with the evaluation of local practice, problems, and staff satisfaction. We then developed and implemented the Vienna Protocol for Neonatal Pain and Sedation. The protocol included well-defined strategies for both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions based on regular assessment of a translated version of the Neonatal Pain Agitation and Sedation Scale and titration of analgesic and sedative therapy according to aim scores. Health care staff was trained in the assessment by using a video-based tutorial and bedside teaching. In addition, we performed reevaluation, retraining, and random quality checks. Frequency and quality of assessments, pharmacologic therapy, duration of mechanical ventilation, and outcome were compared between baseline (12 months before implementation) and 12 months after implementation.
RESULTS:Cumulative median (interquartile range) opiate dose (baseline dose of 1.4 [0.5-5.9] mg/kg versus intervention group dose of 2.7 [0.4-57] mg/kg morphine equivalents; P = .002), pharmacologic interventions per episode of continuous sedation/analgesia (4 [2-10] vs 6 [2-13]; P = .005), and overall staff satisfaction (physicians: 31% vs 89%; P , .001; nurses: 17% vs 55%; P , .001) increased after implementation. Time on mechanical ventilation, length of stay at the ICU, and adverse outcomes were similar before and after implementation.CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a neonatal pain and sedation protocol at 2 ICUs resulted in an increase in opiate prescription, pharmacologic interventions, and staff satisfaction without affecting time on mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care stay, and adverse outcomes. Pediatrics 2013;132:e211-e218 AUTHORS:
“…Frequency and quality of assessments, pharmacologic therapy, duration of mechanical ventilation, and outcome were compared between baseline (12 months before implementation) and 12 months after implementation. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]; P = .005), and overall staff satisfaction (physicians: 31% vs 89%; P , .001; nurses: 17% vs 55%; P , .001) increased after implementation. Time on mechanical ventilation, length of stay at the ICU, and adverse outcomes were similar before and after implementation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…International guidelines for adults [1][2][3][4] and children 5,6 recommend to titrate analgesics and sedative medication according to defined patientspecific end points. This goal is best accomplished by means of validated pain/agitation and sedation assessment using standardized scales.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We discussed the best possible practice including published evidence 1,5,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and our own clinical experience to develop the Vienna Protocol for Neonatal Pain and Sedation (V-PNPS) (Fig 1). The V-PNPS is a detailed protocol for the management of pain, agitation, and sedation and includes frequency of assessments, drug type, dosage, and a flowchart indicating when to use which drug according to N-PASS values.…”
Section: Development Of the Vienna Protocol For Neonatal Pain And Sedmentioning
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the implementation of a neonatal pain and sedation protocol at 2 ICUs.
METHODS:The intervention started with the evaluation of local practice, problems, and staff satisfaction. We then developed and implemented the Vienna Protocol for Neonatal Pain and Sedation. The protocol included well-defined strategies for both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions based on regular assessment of a translated version of the Neonatal Pain Agitation and Sedation Scale and titration of analgesic and sedative therapy according to aim scores. Health care staff was trained in the assessment by using a video-based tutorial and bedside teaching. In addition, we performed reevaluation, retraining, and random quality checks. Frequency and quality of assessments, pharmacologic therapy, duration of mechanical ventilation, and outcome were compared between baseline (12 months before implementation) and 12 months after implementation.
RESULTS:Cumulative median (interquartile range) opiate dose (baseline dose of 1.4 [0.5-5.9] mg/kg versus intervention group dose of 2.7 [0.4-57] mg/kg morphine equivalents; P = .002), pharmacologic interventions per episode of continuous sedation/analgesia (4 [2-10] vs 6 [2-13]; P = .005), and overall staff satisfaction (physicians: 31% vs 89%; P , .001; nurses: 17% vs 55%; P , .001) increased after implementation. Time on mechanical ventilation, length of stay at the ICU, and adverse outcomes were similar before and after implementation.CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a neonatal pain and sedation protocol at 2 ICUs resulted in an increase in opiate prescription, pharmacologic interventions, and staff satisfaction without affecting time on mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care stay, and adverse outcomes. Pediatrics 2013;132:e211-e218 AUTHORS:
“…It should be initiated alongside the introduction of pharmacological interventions. Non-pharmacological interventions include reassurance, good environment (light, noise, smell), frequent communication with the patient, regular family visits, establishment of normal sleep cycles and cognitive-behavioural therapies, such as music therapy; guided imagery and relaxation therapy [9,17] .…”
“…Aetiology of the distress and choice of initial pharmacological intervention is shown in (table 1). Another important factor in deciding the agent is consideration of pharmacokinetic modifying variable, such as age, duration of action, general condition and haemodynamics, hepatic and renal function and the desired degree of sedation, etc [7,9,10] . Sedation and analgesia Goal: The ideal sedative-analgesic goal is for the patient to be awake and comfortable with minimal to no distress, however, some patients may require deeper level of sedation for optimal management (eg.…”
All critically ill children have the right to adequate relief of their pain Correctable physical and environmental factors causing discomfort should be addressed using non-pharmacologic interventions before the initiation of pharmacologic interventions. The choice of sedative-analgesic agent and its initial dose are selected on the basis of several factors such as cause of the distress, desire depth and duration of therapy, clinical condition, potential drug interactions and pharmacokinetic modifying variables. Analgosedation: prioritize the use of analgesia first and then sedation should be the norm while starting sedative-analgesic and reverse to be followed in the weaning process. The level of sedation should be regularly assessed and documented using a sedation assessment scale, wherever possible using a validated scoring system such as the COMFORT scale Once the primary cause of ICU admission is treated, the sedative requirement should fall. Attempt should be made to reduce the level of sedation which require an individualised approach based on clinical condition, drug used for sedation-analgesia, total dose and duration of therapy. During reduction or withdrawal of sedative-analgesic, children should be closely observed for development of withdrawal symptoms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.