2007
DOI: 10.1159/000111037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Liver Metastases from Digestive (Neuro)endocrine Tumors: Foregut, Midgut, Hindgut, and Unknown Primary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
205
0
23

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 278 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
(141 reference statements)
1
205
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…ENETS guidelines identified some essential prerequisites before performing surgery in patients with LM from digestive NETs (48). These criteria include: i) the presence of well-differentiated lesions (Ki67 !5%); ii) the absence of right heart insufficiency; iii) the absence of extra-abdominal disease; and iv) the absence of diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis (48). Under these circumstances, we recognize two different phases in the management of these patients, which are the primary tumor resection and the surgical treatment of liver lesions.…”
Section: Surgery Of Advanced Netsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ENETS guidelines identified some essential prerequisites before performing surgery in patients with LM from digestive NETs (48). These criteria include: i) the presence of well-differentiated lesions (Ki67 !5%); ii) the absence of right heart insufficiency; iii) the absence of extra-abdominal disease; and iv) the absence of diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis (48). Under these circumstances, we recognize two different phases in the management of these patients, which are the primary tumor resection and the surgical treatment of liver lesions.…”
Section: Surgery Of Advanced Netsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curative resection (R0/R1) is associated with a better long-term survival in all series and survival rates of 60-80% can be achieved (48). However, the overall survival after hepatic resection has been reported in 46-86% at 5 years and 35-79% at 10 years (49,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72).…”
Section: Surgery Of Lmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, given the late stage presentation and the high incidence of multifocal and bilobar deposits, radical liver resection is possible in !20% of patients (Steinmuller et al 2008). In order to facilitate better patient selection for treatment, a classification system for neuroendocrine LM based on morphological extent of hepatic involvement has been proposed: type I, a single metastasis of any size; type II, an isolated metastatic bulk accompanied by smaller deposits, with both liver lobes always involved, and type III, disseminated metastatic spread, with both liver lobes always involved, with single lesions of varying size and virtually no normal liver parenchyma (Frilling et al 2009).…”
Section: R170mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th ere are several small series testing capecitabine and temozolomide with response rates in the 40% to 70% range. Palliation of unresectable tumors may be achieved with hepatic arterial embolization with improvement in symptoms and reduction in overall tumor burden (4). Unfortunately in our patient, hypercortisolemia persisted despite available medical and surgical interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%