We investigate the evolution of the network entropy for consensus dynamics in classical and quantum networks. We show that in the classical case, the network differential entropy is monotonically nonincreasing if the node initial values are continuous random variables. While for quantum consensus dynamics, the network's von Neumann entropy is in contrast non-decreasing. In light of this inconsistency, we compare several distributed algorithms with random or deterministic coefficients for classical or quantum networks, and show that quantum algorithms with deterministic coefficients are physically related to classical algorithms with random coefficients.How agreement emerging among a group of agents interacting each other is an intriguing subject in various research disciplines [1][2][3][4][5] . The fundamental idea lies in that, cooperative decisions can lead to consensus in node states throughout a network even each node can only interact with a few neighboring nodes. Inspired by this, consensus control over networks has been systematically studied in the past decade 6,7 , becoming one of the foundational blocks for engineering solutions to distributed coordination problems in multi-agent systems 8 . Recent work 9, 10 , further developed consensus dynamics for quantum networks, where each node corresponds to a qubit 11 . The concepts regarding the network density matrix as statistical ensembles of pure quantum states, reaching a quantum consensus were systematically developed 9 , and it has been shown that a quantum consensus can be reached with the help of quantum swapping operators for both continuous-time and discrete-time dynamics 9,12 . In fact, the two categories of dynamics over classical and quantum networks can be put together into a group-theoretic framework 10 , and quantum consensus dynamics can in fact be equivalently mapped into certain parallel classical dynamics over disjoint subsets of the entries of the network density matrix 12 . This line of research on consensus dynamics is related to the work on quantum walks over complex networks 13,14 , where associated with the network Laplacian there is a Hermitian operator defining the evolution of the network state in a quantum space.Despite of their algorithmic consistency from a high level between classical and quantum consensus dynamics 10,12 , it is worth investigating the two categories of physical processes from an information perspective. Classical consensus dynamics is realized by nodes observing their neighbors' states (or, their relative states) and then taking real-time feedback. On the other hand, such precise state observation among different components in a quantum network is proven to be impossible 11 , and quantum consensus dynamics is realized via nodes interacting not directly, but with the help of local environments which by themselves are quantum subsystems. Tracing out these local environments, the state evolution of the quantum network follows a master equation with the same attraction nature 12 .To this end, we investigate the ...